Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

wearing in your backyard


Recommended Posts

I'm sure that would violate just about every privacy law in the country.  One thing for law enforcement if they have a valid reason and I know there are spy sattalites, but spying on the general public and posting the video's on the internet will likely be a field day for all the lawyers out there.  Can you say, "Hidden Camera In The Ladies Restroom"?

Link to comment

as rusty pin stated.. this would no doubt violation your privacy. I install cameras for a living( along with things) and there is a little know thing called.. expectation of privacy.. It basically says that there are places they you expect a certain amount of privacy. bathrooms.. at the doctors office... your own back yard... 

:no-no-baby-smiley-emoticon:

Link to comment

Back in 1989, I designed a large camp/combat knife. I specified that the 440-C stainless steel blade not be polished, but left a dull grey, saying "If it shines then it shows". Well, if persons can see it, then it shows and pictures can be taken of it regardless of whether you think they should or not. So learn the difference between a bedroom; and a bathroom, and a backyard. Two have four opaque walls and a door. the other does not. If you hang it out there for all to see, then you hang it out there for all to take pictures of. There is a difference between having your privacy violated and giving it away. The latter is done by choice

 

Link to comment

A year before she went into the tank for Trump. Ann Coulter made a very salient remark about cameras in public places. "These are public places, if they can be seen, they can be photographed without violating anyone's privacy". This would also apply to any place where the goings on are accessible to the casual observer. If you do not want people seeing into your back yard, put up a fence that will stop it from being seen by just looking in that direction

To the person who says "I hope they enjoy the view", don't complain if your picture ends up in the paper. or on facebook or some video site. Do you know what a lawyer would cost to prosecute the case? You could by a tremendous number of diapers with what it would set you back, and you could still lose the case. Your boundearies are yours to define and maintain, but YOU have to do the work

Link to comment

I wear 24/7 but would not walk around in the back yard or anywhere in just a diaper nor would you walk around outside the privacy of your home in your underwear my neighbor's not anyone else need to know what or when 

Link to comment

What if they are cloth and rubber panties? then they are not DISPOSABLE underear, "Disposable" does not define "diaper". Ad mine do NOT look like either a bikini or Speedo, which are not underwear. Besides which, who goes out in the back yard in just underwear unless she is a trollop? it is called UNDERwear for a reason. Beyond that, diapers are associated with certain functions, for which they were made

Link to comment
5 hours ago, wetste said:

Its just disposable underwear. No different imo to a bikini or Speedos. 

Like I said to each their own I don't and would not if it's okay to wear in the back yard then it would be alright to walk around town in nothing but a diaper or underwear for those who don't wear diapers and then why stop there lets all become nudists and wear nothing 

Link to comment
20 hours ago, DL4LIFE said:

Expectation of privacy my ass. There's cameras all over the place. The days of expecting privacy is long gone, get used to it.

Agreed, you cant go anywhere without a camera looking at you. Privacy is long gone. Now, give em something to talk about and show that diaper.:lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment

It seems we have a growing number of exhibitionists around here. I would love to be there when you show up in court and maybe required to get a shrink or register as a sex offender if a child is involved, at the office when you are tolld to "collect your things" and you know that your liklihood of getting another job anytime soon is just this side of nil, or when you become "that guy [standing head 'man arrested wearing only a diaper'[". does it bother you that you are imposing your taste on others as well as confirming the worst stereotypes of the ABDL community?

I will pass on all those lovely experiences; thank you

Link to comment
24 minutes ago, Little Christine said:

It seems we have a growing number of exhibitionists around here. I would love to be there when you show up in court and maybe required to get a shrink or register as a sex offender if a child is involved, at the office when you are tolld to "collect your things" and you know that your liklihood of getting another job anytime soon is just this side of nil, or when you become "that guy [standing head 'man arrested wearing only a diaper'[". does it bother you that you are imposing your taste on others as well as confirming the worst stereotypes of the ABDL community?

I will pass on all those lovely experiences; thank you

Well said my point exactly 

Link to comment

Both DPF and DD used to boast that exhibitionists wer not part of our community. Now with this, and a couple of other, threads and "Most Daring Thing You 've Done?" in Sissy Room, that is starting to be a lie. And they'll be the first to complain that we are not "accepted"; well, no. In the first place, since kink was regarded as a private matter, it does not matter if a kink is "accepted" or not. it is behind closed doors and "MYOB". But. as the anti-drunk driving commercial used to go a couple of years back "Your lifestyle is your busienss, but when you take it on the road, it's everybody's business". This seems to be more a DL practice since AB/LG's have many other things to do and the diaper is just one part of a complex story (for me that includes Dolly, Tea Party, Fairy, tiaras and the other things you see on my siggy, "About Me"; pts 1 & 2 and what I have put in the Little Girls' Playhouse), I will not be doing VLG things out in the street and ABLG only makes sense where I have my things nearby. I can have a tea party with Dolly Andrea, Dolly Lisa and Bride Dolly Cassandra whenever I like. For the DL, it appears that the diaper IS the story so the more places they can take it. The "better". I do not have to boast about "wearing" at the movies, gym or whatever. I do not "need" to wear 24/7 to prove my "manhood [so to speak]"" THIS . http://tiarabook.sandralyn.net/cover.html  and its like will speak for me. I would much prefer chatting or discussing the things of my little world with other VLG's and LG's. I wonder if we could have a girl-and-dolly chat tea party and how it would be done

Link to comment
12 hours ago, Little Christine said:

It seems we have a growing number of exhibitionists around here. I would love to be there when you show up in court and maybe required to get a shrink or register as a sex offender if a child is involved, at the office when you are tolld to "collect your things" and you know that your liklihood of getting another job anytime soon is just this side of nil, or when you become "that guy [standing head 'man arrested wearing only a diaper'[". does it bother you that you are imposing your taste on others as well as confirming the worst stereotypes of the ABDL community?

I will pass on all those lovely experiences; thank you

We're not talking about on the street. The thread clearly says "backyard" twice on here your comments come across as a personal attack directed at me. 

The article is about satellites taking live images constantly.

My 'backyard' is totally enclosed and private from anyone else. No one can see in from thier house as no one lives nearby. Maybe before getting on your high horse you should ascertain all the facts before spouting off. As for 'disposable underwear' i was making a direct link to my use of nappies. You wear reusable good for you. I dont so yeah they are disposable underwear TOO ME. How sad that you had to jump on that comment. 

Get a grip. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

The notion of what satellites CAN do and what would be done are two different things. Nearly 4 decades ago, they talked about a satellite that could take a picture of a liscense plate from orbit, also, "to see a golf ball" from orbit. The thing is it takes time, effort and money to use it. You have to know what you want and where it is. That requires intel, then you have to feed the material into the computer to tell the satellite to locate the target,  select the system to use for the widest angle, covering hundreds of thousands of square miles down to the relatively microscopic focus point, and take the shot or video. Scanning systems and focused systems are very different; even if you know what you are looking for, you have to know what that looks like as a spot that is not even "a dot on the map" in relatiom to a  swath that may be 10,000 square miles and changing every second. The scan system does not detect the thing itself but signs of its implications on a large scale. That takes on the order of 1/4 to a couple of days. why would they be targetting persons in their backyards wearing only diapers? The deterrent is what it would cost and what the mission would be competing with in terms of what it would accomplish. You spend all that time and money, take resources away from more vital missions like seeing what's going on in Afghanistan, Iraq or Syria. or Cartegena in Central America or any of the smuggling routes to see someone wearing a diaper in the back yard. IF you are looking in the right place in the right, at most, 6 hour window. The tech has been there for 4 decades and change. it is the human element, monetary cost, opportunity costs and effort, plus the fact that the resources are limited, even with 500 satellites, that makes the scenario into a paranoid sci-fi nightmare. The tech is the cheapest and easiet part, it's the human element that will make it far more than a billion USD and the arguments over priorities and "mission creep" that will consume weeks at a time. The more real thing is drones. Go to B&H's site and price a quad-copter and a half-decent camera

Your best orbit for that kind of thing is a polar orbit approximately 1075 miles up. The satellite would be travelling north/south and the earth would be rotaing under it. You would divide the earth into quadrispheres. the best I can imagine is a system of two kinds of 'spy eyes", the high-altitude scanners at 1075 miles up and the actual picture takers in lower, but faster orbits. The co-ordination and maintanence would be quite daunting. The goal would have to be worth the time and money and even 500 satellites would not make finding and spying on persons in their back yards wearing only diapers worth the time, effort or money. Also photint is far less useful than elint and sigint for the kinds of missions, espionage, that would be running and the scanner satellites would probably be more equipped for those two aspects, leaving the photovideo to the low-orbit devices. So unless they start chipping diapers, that is a long way off, if it even could be "a thing". Can you imagine the Reuters report on 21 Feb 2021 that said they missed the 20,000 casualty terrorist attack on LA because they were spying on persons wearing only diapers in their back yards? Not pretty

Net result; as far as satellite surveillence, just keep your tiara on straight

Link to comment
12 hours ago, wetste said:

We're not talking about on the street. The thread clearly says "backyard" twice on here your comments come across as a personal attack directed at me. 

The article is about satellites taking live images constantly.

My 'backyard' is totally enclosed and private from anyone else. No one can see in from thier house as no one lives nearby. Maybe before getting on your high horse you should ascertain all the facts before spouting off. As for 'disposable underwear' i was making a direct link to my use of nappies. You wear reusable good for you. I dont so yeah they are disposable underwear TOO ME. How sad that you had to jump on that comment. 

Get a grip. 

Unless you have a privacy fence it's the same thing as wearing on the street it's just not right what a grown adult does behind closed doors belongs to remain there behind closed doors not where the whole neighborhood can see why not just take out a newspaper add keep your private business private 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Eugene50 said:

Unless you have a privacy fence it's the same thing as wearing on the street it's just not right what a grown adult does behind closed doors belongs to remain there behind closed doors not where the whole neighborhood can see why not just take out a newspaper add keep your private business private 

Like i said.... there is no chance of anyone seeing me.... 

Link to comment

Well, there is always an Amazon drone

After which a couple of Amazons will come by, pick you up and make you into a Little

Link to comment

Everyone settle down and realize this is a stupid tabloid magazine. Also, everyone realize we already have police oversight like this in the US in the form of cameras everywhere.

Personally, I think the idea is pretty smart for weather, disaster, conflict, and mapping applications.

Link to comment

Sounds at worst like the possibility of the definition of porn being relaxed, or rendered obsolete. Anyway, keep it indoors, or covered up. I wouldn't get too exercised about it. It may have been a slow news day at the Guardian and they were just looking for some salacious filler.103969.png

Link to comment

my backyard is the main road and carpark into the estate so if I wore openly in my backyard it would get me a guaranteed mention in the diapers in the news thread :roflmao: 

Link to comment
On 4/21/2018 at 9:53 AM, Little Christine said:

A year before she went into the tank for Trump. Ann Coulter made a very salient remark about cameras in public places. "These are public places, if they can be seen, they can be photographed without violating anyone's privacy". This would also apply to any place where the goings on are accessible to the casual observer. If you do not want people seeing into your back yard, put up a fence that will stop it from being seen by just looking in that direction

To the person who says "I hope they enjoy the view", don't complain if your picture ends up in the paper. or on facebook or some video site. Do you know what a lawyer would cost to prosecute the case? You could by a tremendous number of diapers with what it would set you back, and you could still lose the case. Your boundearies are yours to define and maintain, but YOU have to do the work

that you find ann colter worth quoting explains a lot about your behavior.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...