Has Anybody Tried "race Car Diapers"?

[kjerrager]

I stumbled across this website they sell a brand of diapers called "Race Car Diapers." I've never heard of these but was considering purchasing a package. Anybody have any comments?????

(Link removed by admin)

[BabyTara]

That's a suspected pedophile site.

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

It seems everykthing is a suspected pedo site

[willnotwill]

You think anybody actually orders the diapers rather than his kiddy porn catalog subscriptions.

[puffybedwetter]

Oh no here we go again. There's actually worser sites than the aforementioned one. Just yesterday I stumbled upon some weirdness involving borderline legal guys in diapers while searching caught wearing diapers on Google. The fact of the matter is the site is still up if it were subject toktokiddie porn the FCC would of cracked down on them a long time ago. So now lets just answer the OPs qurstion right? So no I have not tried the race car diapers. They are similar designs as ABUs stuff. But with different graphics.

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

Not to belabor this point.; but two stories:

Bernie Madoff operated for about 12 years after being reported to the SEC

The store next door has had their EBT processing system down for 3 months while waiting for the government to come and fix it

So I do not know if the fact that the FCC has not come down on that site proves anything

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

Can use use one for a...erm...speedo?

if I wore one under my skirts would they be "drag race car diapers"?

[kjerrager]

Thanks, from the website, I did kind of notice a pedo-esque vibe.....Won't be going there anymore!!!!

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

Let me modify my question then Could they be used as s'pedo's?

[Guest jeff142]

Just a FYI the FCC would not be the one to Handel this, the FBI would.

[puffybedwetter]

Yes the FCC will handel it. They regulate indecencey exposure

Not to belabor this point.; but two stories:

Bernie Madoff operated for about 12 years after being reported to the SEC

The store next door has had their EBT processing system down for 3 months while waiting for the government to come and fix it

So I do not know if the fact that the FCC has not come down on that site proves anything

Still it its actually a pedo site, it should of got shut down years ago. And do you think the government is going to rush to fix an EBT machine? The EBT's can do what I do to eat, work a 15 hour shift. The only thing the feds are good at is collect their monies due, and enforce their regulation. Unless they are top contributors to the US Treasury.

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

Well what id shows is what you get for what takes out 33% of the economy and brags about its servuces and when you call them out on the talk versus the truth you get told "well do you want to throw the baby out with the bath?" What if it's Rosmary's Baby? Aside from that an institution is responsoble to those to whom it makes promises, and for the upkeep of what it takes to do business with it. especially when it destroys jobs to get that money. On the whole though, we are in agreement

[Bettypooh]

Links to the site the OP mentioned are not allowed here, so I removed it. This is the same company that resells another brand of diapers that have a less than 'stellar' value, being of the cheapest quality.

Bettypooh

[square_duck]

Discussion moved over here to 'just diapers' since the subject is a disposable and has nothing to do with cloth diapers....

carry on

[lilannie]

Why does anyone defend that company? Sick.

[Dirty Diaper/Maxipad Lover]

Yes the FCC will handel it.

You're wrong. The FCC only regulates broadcast/over the air content--online activity is out of their juristiction. The FBI's cyber crime division would be the one to go after that site.

Why does anyone defend that company? Sick.

A better question would be why anyone is defending ABU after they did business with that company. "Race Car Diapers" are identical to ABU BMX diapers, and you'll notice that those aren't available anymore. (I can't imagine why.) I agree that no one should be defend that site, but no one should be defend what ABU did either.

[willnotwill]

You don't get it. ABU sells diapers to adults who want to pretend they are kids.

QualityDiapers sells videos and photographs of kids wearing diapers to appeal to pedophilic prurient interests.

[WBDaddy]

You don't get it. ABU sells diapers to adults who want to pretend they are kids.

QualityDiapers sells videos and photographs of kids wearing diapers to appeal to pedophilic prurient interests.

I get it fine. Kyle has done business with pedo interests on several occasions in the past, including declaring D***er.com to be a "sponsor" in one of his newsletters. Kyle has no scruples regarding how he makes his money, so long as the money is made.

[abrichiebc]

So I only belong to two diaper websites that have discussion forums. I believe I made a topic reply to this thread just the other day. So here I am tonight looking for responses on the topic and find that my reply is not here.

Did a moderator remove it for any reason and if so can I be given an explanation as to why?

Are these thread topics not open for honest, open debate and discussion ?

I want to know..

[DailyDi]

I haven't moderated this thread.

[Bettypooh]

As far as I know and can tell, the only moderation in this thread is where I removed the link in the OP and nothing more. I made my first reply noting that removal immediately thereafter so everyone would know our policy regarding that. Discussion is allowed on nearly everything here on DD, including this topic, so long as the discussion remains civilized Only a direct link to 'that site' isn't allowed on this topic. It takes a minimum of two clicks in two different places to complete any Admin action so it is almost impossible that your post was accidentally deleted (they must have been thinking of a klutz like me when they designed that )

My cheezy internet connection-PC-browser combo sometimes gives me problems and doesn't post on the first click. I don't know why but I am pretty sure that problem (which is only occasional) is on my end. If a post matters to me, I re-open the thread in another tab before closing the first to be sure it posted and hit send again in the first tab if it didn't Go ahead and repost then check that it did post afterward

Bettypooh

[willnotwill]

That and someone moved it out of the cloth group, but I was the one who pushed the REPORT button complaining about that.

[MegaChar]

No.

I condone companies who use children in ads. That company has a bad rep to them far worse then Rearz ever did. Its so bad thats their action was out of line:

I actually have proof that their ads of children was for pedophic reasons.

[Little Cub Pants]

7 hours ago, MegaChar said:

No.

I condone companies who use children in ads. That company has a bad rep to them far worse then Rearz ever did. Its so bad thats their action was out of line:

I actually have proof that their ads of children was for pedophic reasons.

Really? wow! I always thought that they were an bedwetting site. But I always found there use of children on their website a little bit odd and unsettling. They explained why, but I still found that to be very odd.😕

[foreverdl]

I just read the whole thread, I am glad they shut down the link