Diaper Tapes Are Ready!

[Kari]

ATTENTION: Those interested in Diaper Tapes...

I downloaded every tape in Pamperchu's collection since his site is hit and miss.

Some are down. But I got all the information and png files I could.

For those asking what's a png file???

It's a lossless file and more capable of keeping an authentic look.

If anyone is more comfortable using jpeg's a conversion can be made.

From what I see the average packing tape size is 2

[Kari]

All Diaper Tapes are being listed in the gallery section.

Just get your fav diaper, clear tape, and choose and print out your favorite design.

Also, add your own or make suggestions for the rest of us!

HERE'S THE LINK... http://www.dailydiap...lery&album=1525

(More to come)

I also tried making a Daily Diapers Logo tape to put on an Attends waistband diaper.

Not exactly what I wanted it to end up looking like. But a sufficient prototype.

And If anyone believes I did it to try and gain "browning points" with Mikey...

Well, You are absolutely correct in making that sort of assumption, thank you very much.

[Dubious]

Just a personal question, is that you in that first picture?, cause you dont look like your 44...

[Kari]

Just a personal question, is that you in that first picture?, cause you dont look like your 44...

Just as well since I became 45 recently and haven't had a chance to change it. (my age & my diaper)

[Dirty Diaper/Maxipad Lover]

I forget the first one, but I think they are Fitti XXL.

I have the Fitti Size 6 if that's what you mean by Fitti XXL, but they are and always were in a JPEG file.

[Kari]

[TRUNCATED] "but they are and always were in a JPEG file."

Maybe by a setting on your PC or your device.

But in the Gallery section, they are in .PNG (lossless) file format.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics

[Dirty Diaper/Maxipad Lover]

Maybe by a setting on your PC or your device.

But in the Gallery section, they are in .PNG (lossless) file format.

http://en.wikipedia....etwork_Graphics

There was nothing in your gallery when I made my previous post, I'm talking about the original file from Pamperchu's website--that's the one that I uploaded in this thread. Pamperchu's original file is a 1600x1236 JPEG. Your file is a 1554x1200 PNG, but that's not the original file. My upload was from a file that I downloaded in 2010 so I just went back to Pamperchu's website to be sure that it was the same, and it's still a 1600x1236 JPEG there.

If you created the 1554x1200 PNG from the 1600x1236 JPEG, then the only thing you've really done is reduced the resolution and increase in the file size from 1.3MB to 2.5MB. The picture quality was already lost when the file was saved as a JPEG--saving it as a PNG isn't going to bring that quality back. In fact, the reduction in resolution from 1600x1236 to 1554x1200 actually did create minor quality loss. Of course more quality loss would have occured if the file had been given another round of JPEG compression.

Here are links to both files so that everyone reading this can see what I mean:

Pamperchu's File: squeek.homedns.org/diapertapes/downloads/[2009]Fitti_Size-6_Diaper_page.jpg

Kari's File: www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/gallery/album_1525/gallery_194_1525_928294.png

I don't mean to sound confrontational or anything--I just wanted to let you know that the file in your gallery isn't the original.

[Kari]

Okay...

[~Pamperchu~]

Even the tapes on my website are not the orginal files. I scan the tapes to raw files at 600 dpi and do all the editing, Then I render the maser to PNG at around 33 megapixles. The master files are normaly around 30MB but can be as high as 100MB if I scanned at 1200dpi. I render a jpeg or PNG from the master down to a size my server can handle.

[Dirty Diaper/Maxipad Lover]

Even the tapes on my website are not the orginal files. I scan the tapes to raw files at 600 dpi and do all the editing, Then I render the maser to PNG at around 33 megapixles. The master files are normaly around 30MB but can be as high as 100MB if I scanned at 1200dpi. I render a jpeg or PNG from the master down to a size my server can handle.

That's true, but I was referring specifically to the original files for distribution--not the raw files. I should have been clearer about that. My point was that in addition to being a smaller file your JPEG was clearer then the PNG, and would have been a better choice for the gallery. I'll spare everyone the technical reasons for the difference in the two files.