Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

Man Is Taking Used Diapers Out Of My Garbage Cans! (Weird Situation)


Recommended Posts

sorry but that is BS.so you are saying that i am atramp or mentally ill?There are tens of 1,000's of people in this country who go through trash cans.Like i said dont talk about something that you know little about.

Ah bollocks, I've never seen people going through trash bins on the pavement. Unless it was a tramp looking for food/rubbish. Or some weirdo with a mental problem throwing rubbish all over the street whilst digging through the rubbish.

There's a bag lady who goes through street trash cans and literally collects rubbish in my local area. As I seen the same women many times when I been out for a walk.

Link to comment

theres easier ways of attaining soiled nappys if thats your thing. There's gold to be found in pretty much any fastfood restaurants disabled WC, the ones that often double up as baby changers.

Take a large bag and knock yourself out

LOL

As the saying goes one man's rubbish is another man's treasure. :roflmao: LMFAO

Link to comment

Yes, they are called "politically incorrect" , "90% of the population", "people with lives who have not the time or inclination to get caught up in the latest mediaspeak",also "real people".

Link to comment

really? really? people still use the word tramp to refer to a homeless person? i mean really???? tramp????

I know the difference, homeless person sleeps in shop door ways in an old sleeping bag, steals or begs for food.

Some of them go into a homeless shelter.

Tramp, goes through bins for food and sleeps on park benches.

Link to comment

A tramp is a long term homeless person who travels from place to place as an itinerant vagrant, traditionally walking or hiking all year round. In British English meanwhile a tramp simply refers to a homeless person, usually not a travelling one.

Suffice to say, i refer to the homeless as tramps, being from the UK, though it may not be pollitcally correct saying nowdays, not that i care.

Link to comment

tramp has taken on a new meaning in the usa... now usually a tramp is a slutty woman...

so in the usa to call someone a tramp who is a homeless person is very outdated....

why i was giggling.... because here you are just homeless..... theres no real distinction... whether you travel or not... you are homeless.... so you are a homeless person.

Link to comment

Words like faucet, diaper and fall are infact very outdated British words that we stopped using many years ago, yet the migrants that went to the states continued to use them.

Luckily my wife is from the US, so i feel i have a good knowledge of American English :).

and also, even though diapers are called nappies here, i still call em diapers.

But tramp is a very fun word, does roll off the tongue

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Yeas: Who would have gone to see THE LADY AND THE HOMLESS PERSON? Can you imagine a Rock group called Superhomelssperson? Or how about a novel beginning with "I was down on my luck and returning to the States aboard a homeless person steamer out of Madrid..."

The thing about political correctness is it shows that fanaticism of it's practitioners. Imagine if the Rolling Stones had done PAINT IT AFRICAN-AMERICAN or if Los Bavos had called their song AFRICAN-AMERICAN IS AFRICAN-AMERICAN. how about an African-American Widos Spider? and I will not even consider "African-American hole"

When they started using "physically challenged" and "mentally challenged" we had such a field day with it (short="vertically challenged") that now anyone who uses "... challenged" has no credibility in the real world

I have very poor eyesight (how poor is it? It is so poor that when GONE WITH THE WIND came out and the poster was 4 feet tall, I did not get to finish reading the title before it was blown away). One day, I was on David Brudnoy's readi talk show where I was fairly well known and he made the usual reference to understanding as "see" and just to get a laugh (successfully) I said in a pseudo-offended and lecturing voice "Casting understanding in terms of seeing is a slghtist slur agains persons of blind"

Link to comment

There seems to be a lot of projection going on with the assumption that this guy must be some sort of sexual deviant. My first thought is't "he must be a pedo;" it's "he's probably an obsessive hoarder."

Also, pics or it didn't happen (sorry, couldn't resist).

Link to comment

If he were a hoarder then would he not be taking more useful things than diapers, especially used ones? and if he is a hoarder and hoarding used diapers, then this has a better than even chance of becoming a public health issue which means call the authorities

I think we can agree, though, that even if he is a pedo, it is more a mental health issue than a law enforcemt one. since, at least in 1973, when I first came across it in my Abnormal Psych class, it was considered an Abnormal

Incidentally, I like the way you concealed your personal attack under the aegis of psychology. It gives the perfect example of psychobabble (the illigitimate use of psychological terminology), perhaps a case of Reaction Formation or Denial

If you wish to check my credentials I can name some of my instructors

1971-73 Leo Anrfeld. Daniel O'Neill: Bristol Community College

1973-75. George Raymond, Leigh Hirsch, Ted Bosack, Steve Misxovitch, Jack Colby: Providence College

1975-78 Florence Hennen, Philip Very, Spencer DeVault, Tim Belchier, James Rubovitch: Rhode Island College

Sorry TT but I have to put you down on this since you are using the mental health field to attack others without properly testing your hypothesis. If it is a joke, it is the kind that is out of place in a non-professional setting and would only be acceptable among professional and colleagues

Link to comment

NOTE: Message split due to quote limit.

Wow, some people here are being rather judgmental without having all (or even most) of the facts. I'll get to my opinion on the subject matter in a moment, but I want to cover a few things that have derailed the thread previously. First, I'm going to give the OP the benefit of the doubt that he's telling the truth, even though some people haven't. Second, let me address the difference between US and UK law.

Actually if the bin is on YOUR land, he's trespassing.

Your location says that you live in London, in the UK. That may be true in your country, but it is not true in the United States. Trash placed for collection is generally not considered "private property" in this country. State/local laws may vary however. Those who wish to keep their trash "private property" tend to hire private trash collection services, which come onto a person's property and empty the cans themselves.
Let us not convict the guy without any grounds, there is no harm in taking what others have tossed in there garbage.
Agreed. As long as it's not something that could be used to harm a person, (e.g. financial information) I don't see a problem with someone taking my trash. After all, I'm throwing it out anyway.

Three cases from a quick Google search, all involving taking used diapers by various means (some definitely theft, some not so clear)...The ONLY encouragement we should be giving these people is to get their diapers from the same place the rest of us do - from the store, in an unused state, in exchange for money!

I have to respectfully disagree with you, AutieAB. There's an important distinction between taking used diapers from a trash can, and the events in the articles you cited.

  1. Article 1: The man was arrested and convicted for possession of child pornography, not for the fact that he enjoyed used diapers. Furthermore, you yourself noted that the article itself was poorly written. There's a distinction between "man takes diapers from restaurant bathroom trash," and "man possesses child pornography." The latter is definitely illegal, while the former could be considered illegal because the trash had not been put out for collection yet, and was located inside of the restaurant, which is private property.

  2. Article 2: A bit more on-topic, but still missing the point. Makuski committed a crime by breaking and entering. Taking diapers--used or otherwise--from within the house constitutes theft. Again, although the diapers are in the trash, the trash has not been put out for collection. There's actually a legal distinction here: trash put out for collection is generally not considered "private property," while trash that has not been put out for collection is still considered to be "private property," or located within private property.

  3. Article 3: This is similar to the above situation, but different. The cloth diapers were to be picked up by a diaper service to be cleaned and reused. This is theft, because the diapers in question weren't trash, or placed for collection with trash. Furthermore, a person's porch constitutes private property in the US, while the area from the sidewalk to the street does not. (Although you're required to maintain the strip of land between your sidewalk and your curb, it's technically the property of your state, just as the inside of your mailbox is the property of the Federal government.)

Not sure. Figured I'd have you guys weigh in on the situation.
You handled this incredibly well. The fact that the guy took the Bambino leads me to believe that he's a DL or even an AB. As you kind of implied yourself, there are some DLs that like used diapers, so I could understand why the man took the used diaper.
Link to comment

As for the issue of used diapers being unsanitary, I should probably touch on a couple of facts. Used diapers containing fecal matter are highly unsanitary. Used diapers containing urine are, generally speaking, relatively harmless. Unless the person who used them is ill or they're growing mold on them, they really aren't that unsanitary. (Obviously it's best to wash ones hands after handling them, but they're not as unsanitary as many here would believe.) Of course, it's better to have an unused diaper to enjoy, and it was nice of you to leave the man the Bambino.

If I were in your situation, I'd consider any of the following as a "next step." Do you have a number that you can be reached at, where the man won't be able to trace it back to your home? What about a generic e-mail address? If so, I would leave him the note, and simply write that number/e-mail address on it with a short message that says something to the effect of. "We may have some things in common call/write to me and we can talk." Once you "screen" the guy and determine that he's definitely another DL, then you can consider a face-to-face meeting.

If it turns out that the guy is just a DL, find out if he prefers unused diapers or used diapers. If he prefers unused diapers, ask him why he was interested in your daughter's used diapers. It could simply be that the man prefers used diapers, or enjoys both used/unused diapers equally, or can't afford to purchase unused diapers etc.

If he prefers used diapers, (or if it turns out that he likes both,) make him the following proposal: Offer to separate the wet ones from the messy ones for him, and offer to leave the wet ones in a location that's easily accessible and noticeable. (This could be a bag marked "wet" in the trash can, or another container/location of your choosing.) In exchange for the wet diapers, ask/require that the man not take the messy ones out of the garbage can. This way, the man can still have access to used/wet diapers which are relatively sanitary, without being exposed to the far more unsanitary and dangerous diapers containing fecal matter. What's more, you can leave them in a location that will keep the man from going through your trash can if you so choose, and you may make a new DL friend in the process. (Now if the guy turns out to be a pedophile, then by all means, call the cops as soon as you find out. The only reason I didn't say this sooner is because I think it's a rather obvious "duh" statement.) Once you're sure that he's just a DL, then by all means point him here. :)

How does liking used diapers have anything to do with liking young children? The AB/DL community, more than any in the world, should understand how this isn't pedophilia.

The short answer to your question Goden is that it doesn't. I've met other DLs who enjoy used diapers, but they're afraid to post on sites like this out of fear that ignorant members of the community will brand them as pedophiles. As you yourself alluded to, there's a difference between liking diapers used by a young child, and liking young children. I agree with your statement entirely as well. We as a community should be the most capable of understanding that the enjoyment of baby/child/youth diapers, used or otherwise, does not constitute pedophilia. (I posted the actual definition of the term awhile back when we had a member here who enjoyed used diapers, in part to prove the point that the member wasn't a pedophile.) Most members here may not be into used baby diapers, but even if they were, that wouldn't make them pedophiles. What would make them pedophiles would be if they were (sexually) interested in the children who wore those used baby diapers, at which point we'd have very good reason to want them locked up for life. The enjoyment of used baby diapers does not constitute pedophilia, plain and simple.

I would leave the guy alone, we all have fetishes that particular one may be his and his way of dealing with life.

Let us not convict the guy without any grounds, there is no harm in taking what others have tossed in there garbage.

As I may have mentioned above, I agree with most of what you said. I wouldn't mind if the OP contacted him to make sure that he was a harmless DL, and maybe make a new friend, but I really don't see any harm in what's going on here. If this guy's fetish is used baby diapers, I'd say let him enjoy them. As long as he's not harming anyone, I don't see a problem here. It'd be different if we had proof that the guy was actually a pedophile, at which point we'd all be in agreement to have him locked up--no one is disputing that.

With what we currently know though, there's really no harm in what's occurred, and what I mentioned above would further reduce the risk of harm coming to him, and allow the guy to enjoy his fetish. As you yourself said, "there's no harm in taking what others have tossed in their garbage." Of course, there's some simple etiquette that should be observed here: First, don't litter/don't make a mess. If one takes garbage from a person's can, they should put the contents back in the can where they found them, and should avoid leaving a mess in the can or on the person's lawn for said person to clean up later. (In other words, be polite.) Second, don't take "sensitive/personal" information. Diapers are one thing, but bank statements and the like are another. While the person throwing these items away should be destroying them beforehand, those who are going through the trash shouldn't be taking them either.

Finally, let be completely honest about how I'd feel if I saw someone going through my trash. As long as the person wasn't taking personal/sensitive information, (see above,) I really wouldn't mind. As long as my cans remained clean, my lawn remained free of debris, and the person taking garbage from my cans did so at their own risk, I seriously would be fine with it. Let me touch on used diapers specifically. If a male was taking my used diapers that I'd thrown away out of my trash, I wouldn't mind as long as they didn't tell me what they planned to do with them. (I'm straight, I don't want to know.) If a female was taking my used diapers that I'd thrown away out of my trash, I'd be fine with that as well, and I wouldn't mind knowing what the woman planned on doing with them. If I had a child, and if a male was taking my child's used diapers out of my trash, I wouldn't mind so long as I knew that person was an AB/DL and not a pedophile. Once again, I wouldn't want to know what that person planned to do with the diapers, but as long as he wasn't harming my kid, I wouldn't care about the diapers. If I had a child, and if a female was taking my child's used diapers out of my trash, I wouldn't mind so long as I knew that she was an AB/DL and not a pedophile either. As I mentioned before, I wouldn't mind knowing what the woman planned on doing with the used diapers, and as long as she wasn't harming my kid, I'd be happy to let her have the used diapers. Assuming that I was around when the person was taking the diapers, I'd probably ask them to leave the messy ones in the trash for their own safety, and make the same proposal that I suggested above. You and/or I may prefer that our diapers be unused when we put them on, but there are some AB/DLs who feel differently, and as long as they're not harming anyone, I see no reason for us to treat them differently then any other AB/DLs. Just my $0.02 cents.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Would not contacting the individual to see if he is harmless, in view of the fact that this is a bizarre situation that would be finding out the hard way for a person who is most likel not able to handle it if he is not or is not equipped to judge the matter accurately. What if the person turns out not to be physically vionet but a real haunt? There is an awful lot of "I think" here (including on my part; I am counselling caution) My law teacher used to say "don't 'think', it gets you in trouble" and I restate it as "Don't 'think': Know". To show how bizarre Total Trash has some credibility when she says "Pics or it didn't happen..." When you get yourself deeper in a bizarre situation, you are in new territory and you have no map. Not only do you have to watch out for the snakes and tigers, but also the quicksand and the harmless looking plants

Link to comment

how about just ignoring the situation and letting the guy be. So a guy likes garbage and diapers, I see people looking in the trash all the time, usually for aluminum cans, but who cares. I doubt he wants any attention brought to himself. Live and let live.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

If he were a hoarder then would he not be taking more useful things than diapers, especially used ones? and if he is a hoarder and hoarding used diapers, then this has a better than even chance of becoming a public health issue which means call the authorities

I think we can agree, though, that even if he is a pedo, it is more a mental health issue than a law enforcemt one. since, at least in 1973, when I first came across it in my Abnormal Psych class, it was considered an Abnormal

Your readings of Samuel Delaney obviously didn't include any of his critiques of "urban renewal" under Giuliani, or you would understand how the "public health" argument is a weapon of class warfare. You would also hopefully understand the intersection between psychology and law enforcement via the pathologization of "undesirables."

Incidentally, I like the way you concealed your personal attack under the aegis of psychology. It gives the perfect example of psychobabble (the illigitimate use of psychological terminology), perhaps a case of Reaction Formation or Denial

If you wish to check my credentials I can name some of my instructors

1971-73 Leo Anrfeld. Daniel O'Neill: Bristol Community College

1973-75. George Raymond, Leigh Hirsch, Ted Bosack, Steve Misxovitch, Jack Colby: Providence College

1975-78 Florence Hennen, Philip Very, Spencer DeVault, Tim Belchier, James Rubovitch: Rhode Island College

Sorry TT but I have to put you down on this since you are using the mental health field to attack others without properly testing your hypothesis. If it is a joke, it is the kind that is out of place in a non-professional setting and would only be acceptable among professional and colleagues

The only thing in my post that I could possibly imagine being construed as "psychological terminology" was my use of the term "projection." Seeing as my post was addressed to anonymous internet denizens with whom I have no personal experience, it seems pretty clear that I was not making any sort of personality judgment, but merely commenting on what was said. I also never attacked your credentials, nor do I care what they are. Show your credibility through the persuasiveness of your arguments, not by waving your penis* (er...I mean diplomas, sorry) in people's faces. And thanks for providing a perfect example of how to combine "You're not being intellectual enough" with "You're being overly intellectual." You even dismissed me preemptively as "out of place in a non-professional setting" just in case I did show some background in psychology (never mind that I wasn't the one psychoanalyzing the guy; I was just pointing out that it takes a pretty big leap to get from "some guy's going through people's trash" to "he must be a closet fetishist").

*You list your gender identity in your profile as "male," so I'm making the assumption that you consider "penis" an acceptable term. Please correct me if this is not the case. By no means do I want to condone using misgendering as a debate tactic.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Your readings of Samuel Delaney obviously didn't include any of his critiques of "urban renewal" under Giuliani, or you would understand how the "public health" argument is a weapon of class warfare. You would also hopefully understand the intersection between psychology and law enforcement via the pathologization of "undesirables."

The only thing in my post that I could possibly imagine being construed as "psychological terminology" was my use of the term "projection." Seeing as my post was addressed to anonymous internet denizens with whom I have no personal experience, it seems pretty clear that I was not making any sort of personality judgment, but merely commenting on what was said. I also never attacked your credentials, nor do I care what they are. Show your credibility through the persuasiveness of your arguments, not by waving your penis* (er...I mean diplomas, sorry) in people's faces. And thanks for providing a perfect example of how to combine "You're not being intellectual enough" with "You're being overly intellectual." You even dismissed me preemptively as "out of place in a non-professional setting" just in case I did show some background in psychology (never mind that I wasn't the one psychoanalyzing the guy; I was just pointing out that it takes a pretty big leap to get from "some guy's going through people's trash" to "he must be a closet fetishist").

*You list your gender identity in your profile as "male," so I'm making the assumption that you consider "penis" an acceptable term. Please correct me if this is not the case. By no means do I want to condone using misgendering as a debate tactic.

Whether used at a person or a group that you do not have personal knowledge of, in a combative context or manner, it is a slur and a misuse of a psychological term. In the case of a group it is prejudicial and bigoted. Incidentally, "insanity" and "insane" are not based in or part of Psychology. That is legal and caual terminology

In pop psych, which is usually bogus or incomplete "projection" is used to mean unhealthy. In the real thing, it is understood to be a normal expressive function. its use in unlealthy behavior is where Freude first noticed it and listed it a noe of several "defense mechanisms". It is the attribution of one's own characteristics to another person or thing

Penis is a technical term. I list my physical sex as a courtesy to others so that there is no misunderstanding. In the other sections I would prefer to have used Transgendered or T-Girl but those have become so confused with Transexual that they are almost meaningless. As a Little Girl, I duscuss such things in a ladylike way and say "flower" (both male and female: there are female ALG's as well as Mommies, governesses, etc), but that is in an intimate ALG settings (one thing that sets us apart from Sissy), unless it involves technical usage Thank you for your consideration

Link to comment

I'm just amazed at the debate that continues to rage here.

If the OP's account is trustworthy, the person in question has made plainly obvious through his behavior that he is, in fact, a closet DL, and not a piss fetishist (not that there's anything wrong with that) or a pedo.

According to the account, OP basically seeded the trash can with three things: A used baby diaper, a used adult "baby" style diaper, and a clean adult "baby" style diaper. The man took the clean one and left the other two.

This speaks volumes about his real desires. One does not need multiple degrees in psychology to figure this out.

If the OP wanted to continue to take pity on the man in question, he would continue leaving clean diapers in his trash for the man to find and enjoy. He might even give him a note with the website address (and potentially the customer service phone number, in case said person had no internet access, which is quite likely) where he procured those diapers, in order to facilitate him being able to find them himself.

If the OP wanted to overreact, he could indeed inform the authorities. Of course, the problem with this move is that the OP would then have to explain why he had diapers in his trashcan when he doesn't have an infant in the house - not to mention having adult-sized diapers with baby prints on them. This could be incredibly embarrassing for the OP, and probably would be an action of last resort if he felt the person rooting through his trash were a real threat to his physical well-being.

This would be why I made the insinuations about Christine's little playhouse being called into question. Christine, do you seriously intend to tell me that you would call the law if some guy dug up used adult-sized baby diapers out of your trash, knowing full well that the officers dispatched to investigate your complaint would inevitably question your own, highly unusual, lifestyle?

Quite frankly, I don't think you would. God help you if you did, though, because you'd be run up a flagpole on the evening news so fast you couldn't book a flight out of the country fast enough to escape it.

Link to comment

Whether used at a person or a group that you do not have personal knowledge of, in a combative context or manner, it is a slur and a misuse of a psychological term. In the case of a group it is prejudicial and bigoted. Incidentally, "insanity" and "insane" are not based in or part of Psychology. That is legal and caual terminology

In pop psych, which is usually bogus or incomplete "projection" is used to mean unhealthy. In the real thing, it is understood to be a normal expressive function. its use in unlealthy behavior is where Freude first noticed it and listed it a noe of several "defense mechanisms". It is the attribution of one's own characteristics to another person or thing

To reiterate:

I wasn't the one psychoanalyzing the guy; I was just pointing out that it takes a pretty big leap to get from "some guy's going through people's trash" to "he must be a closet fetishist."

And where did I make any judgment that anyone was behaving in an "unhealthy" way? "Projection" is pretty recognizable in colloquial speech as just the assumption that other people are motivated by the same kind of things you(pl.) are. Nothing more, nothing less. In this case someone with a diaper fetish might assume that anyone taking diapers out of a trash can was also a fetishist, even though there are any number of reasons people go through trash, not all of which are undertaken with the goal of finding something useful.

Link to comment

Update: I had to wait until garbage day to find out if there were any real progress, but here goes.

I watched the bin VERY closely until noon when I had to leave for work. Last week I left around 10:30, so I figured if the guy was going to come back, it would be around then.

He showed up around 11. I could see him coming down the block. He looked VERY uneasy as he approached and spotted the "signal" single diaper sitting on top of the bin!

It bothered him so much so, that he did an about face before he even got near my house! I can imagine that his prior actions have been going through his mind, and all these fears have popped up. He must have known that he was set up with the adult diapers sitting right on top inside of the can! It was almost as if he could FEEL my eyes on him, even though I sat peaking through the blinds. When he spotted the diaper sitting on top of the can he kind of froze in his tracks and looked like he had seen a ghost. As he turned around to walk the other way, he peeked back. I'm pretty good at reading people, and I could tell he was curious and torn! You could tell that he wasn't sure if it was a friendly symbol, or if he was being set up. If he is the guy my wife's talking about, then he's a pretty respectable guy in the community, and if there were video of him taking a diaper out of a garbage can it could potentially ruin him.

Like I said, I think he did it the first time because he was overwhelmed, but I think he came to his senses.

In case anyone's wondering, I did what was recommended, this time I left him a fresh (unused) Bambino with a note inside with this website along with a few others, explaining infantalism and DL in a serious manner.

Well, he never took the bait, so unfortunately I had to retrieve it before the garbage man came.

I'm hoping this isn't the end of it, because I would love to start a quiet relationship with a fellow DL neighbor!

I'm planning on forcing contact in the future. I have an idea where he lives now. Once I'm sure I'll try to come up with a plan that will let me drop a hint to him in a very discrete way to let him know I'm friendly and not trying to set him up with Chris Hansen and Dateline. (If I were him, I'd be scared shitless about what I did)

I can't leave a diaper in his mailbox or even a note for that matter incase his wife finds it... I'd hate to "out" him (that's not my goal).

So, if anyone has any ideas about how to "make contact". Maybe I should just keep leaving a diaper on top of the trash can, or wait til he walks by the house and strike up a conversation with him and be really friendly, I'm not sure. Give me some ideas guys.

Link to comment

...

wait til he walks by the house and strike up a conversation with him and be really friendly

...

Sounds like a plan to me. Don't mention the nappies/ diapers immediately. Find out if he's got online access and maybe slip him the URL. Mind you, if he's on a shared machine, he might not want to go for this...

Or you could just spring it on him in the conversation, something like: "... and, did it fit you? Don't worry, I am a wearer, too." Your confession, which you have practically already given anyway, should assure him a bit that you're not out to stitch him up.

Paranoia warning:

If your wife knows who he is, go find something out about him, first. Maybe he'll turn out to be working on behalf of the authorities to catch you (a dangerous, nappy-wearing criminal) and was just retrieving evidence. :thumbsup:

Keep us posted!

Link to comment

Note to WBdaddy The OP has an infant in the house. Please get your facts straight. Beyond that I do not have adult-sized baby diapers in my trash and the odds are 100% against it. Again, if you had the ability to think rationally or any experience you would know this: When have I been a part of the throw-away diaper class? And no, the officer would not question anything save "Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts" The conversation would stay on the matter in question and my exotic lifestyle would not even come up. I have had experience with police and know how they do things. So all you have is insinuations, which plus $5 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbuck's. Labelled and dismissed

As to the matter of psychoanyzing. That kind of thing used to be great sport among the "intelligentsia" in the form of hurling Freudian barbs at each other while forgetting that old Siggy said that "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar" and that Freudianism had fallen out of favor with the pros by that time . That changed in 1964 with the claim that 600 psychiatrists had found Barry Goldwater unstable, which, if they spoke out on the matte as psychological professionals with no corraborating diagnostics, personal experience or first hand witness accounts in sufficient number to make their case, they would have lost their licenses. That introduced psychology as a social weapon and has brought about a very charged atmosphere

Now, with the collapse of relgion, psychologizing and psychobabble have become the new methods of Inquisition. However the old "intellectuals" who threw these barbs at each other, especially projection, about which I know quite a bit. were well-versed in Freudianism. Now when it is used as a weapon, there is, like with the Inquisition the implicit notion that the Inquisitor is somehow better than his victim in, believe it or not, a moral, or the "intellectual"'s equivalent of moral, way and acts by the equivalent of divine right

As to the role of the authorities, we must first understand that this is a bizarre or strange case which makes it extraordinary with ramifications that are too open to speculation. He is making a conscious efflrt to be unnoticed and the alternative of getting his own adult diapers exists. Ergo there is something not right here. If the guy is harmless, he certainly could use some treatment. If called, the authorities would most likely look in the area of mental health first/ At least an ID can be made

I do not recall if anything was said about his appearance. If he was shabby that says one thing, if he was otherwise, that opens up other possibilities.

Link to comment

Now your even doing sick innuendos....

And not all paintings are legal either, it might be art, that pic certainly ain't though. But even art can be illegal sometimes.

Maybe in the UK, but I cant think of any law that allows for the prosecution of creating any type of art, pornographic or otherwise.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...