Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

lord.bill

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Previous Fields

  • Diapers
    Diaper Lover
  • I Am a...
    Trans FtM
  • Age Play Age
    4-5

Profile Information

  • Real Age
    19

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

lord.bill's Achievements

Newborn

Newborn (1/7)

1

Reputation

  1. First and foremost, this a privately owned website and the owner/moderators can reserve the right to ban whoever they want. That said, the ABDL community is pretty niche and dailydiapers is largest and most active online community (it's been my impression ADISC is smaller and less active, I could be wrong, though.) People are really going to want to avoid getting banned from here because there isn't really anywhere equivalent. Being upset about a ban and wanting an appeals process isn't necessarily the same as throwing a fit after getting banned off of a political discourse subreddit, getting banned means major loss or restriction of access to the ABDL community. There are absolutely people that should be banned, but I think dailydiapers has a degree of social responsibility to not create situations that precipitate bans. That is, if violation of a rule can get you banned, that rule should be clear and obvious to all users. I think an appeals process might be fair considering the role of dailydiapers in the ABDL community, particularly because it appears that there has not always been a large amount of communications before or after bans. Mistakes happen. Users and moderators. I don't think an appeals process needs to (or even should) include the community, but a description of the appealed issue from both (or more) parties could be put forth to all the moderators which can agree/disagree if the ban is fair. This could aid in rule violations being punished uniformly and impartially. A tangle that I see here is that the (invisible) rule against multiple accounts means that the banning of your account constitutes a lifetime ban from dailydiapers. OP's original account was banned for it's name and misstated age. It makes sense to ban an account that violates the (invisible) rules- but with no communication and a ban on further accounts, that means that that individual is banned from ever having an account on dailydiapers ever again, which seems somewhat harsh. As to the age/birthday rule seeming "implied:" first, I agree with kasarberang that "implied" is not accessible for people with some disabilities. Second, there are confusing things, as is, that make the "implied" part a bit harder to parse. It might be assumed that birthday needed to be accurate. But it was visible on our profiles for five years. It could be interpreted that the public nature was for other users to wish a us a happy birthday, making accuracy not as important. I find the lack of care to our privacy kind of disturbing. Then, the "real age" field allows us to type in a number. This number does not change with our stated birthday, because it doesn't even have to be a number. I could type "diapers" or "grilled cheese" into it and it wouldn't care. This does not generally scream to me as a field that must be accurate. There's also the weird overlap between trans/nb identities in both the (optional) gender field (which is in the same section as the real age field) and the "I am a...." field (which is in the diaper etc. field) which makes it seem like that section might not necessarily be intended for vital account information. Then there's I think a telling thing- in this discussion there have been a lot of posts talking about the website being 21+ (even from US posters.) As far as I know, this website is 18+ (dailydiapers.com says "if you are 18+ you may enter," but I haven't seen anything entering into or in the forum itself that says an age limit) I am 20 years old. I am not a minor. I am not buying alcohol on here. If it turns out this website really is supposed to be 21+, then banish me, I guess. But I don't think it is. And if any sizeable amount of your user base isn't sure whether it's 18+ or 21+ then the age rules are not clear enough.
  2. One thing I find a little confusing about this post is how the fear of scrutiny would "make it difficult to request diapers." Would you be looking for insurance coverage or something? I don't know why you would need to have a doctor approve you to wear diapers. I think that in many (a large minority) of cases of incontinence there is no definite cause found, though this would apply more to older people. There could be numerous issues with muscles or nerves that would be difficult to determine. I doubt doctors would do a major investigation unless you wanted one (they might refer you to a urologist, but you don't actually need to take that referral.) Even if they did run a bunch of tests, if they couldn't find anything I can't see a situation where they'd decide you must be faking it (maybe if you were suing someone for damages?) Unless you would somehow have a tangible monetary benefit from being diagnosed as incontinent, there'd be so reason to assume that its something you would want to fake. You could actually tell your doctor it's a choice, some people on here have done that. There are numerous threads on peoples' experiences with their doctors. That being said, having bottom surgery would probably erase any suspicion they had. Bottom surgery differently has the potential to damage nerves related to urinary sensation and control. I know one trans woman whose control was impacted by surgery. I've heard that incontinence can happen, but I don't know much it's frequency or details because it's a bit taboo to talk about permanent complications particularly around continence, and most of the trans people I interact with are young and transmasculine. I'm relatively certain that being incontinent would not impact your ability to get surgery. I'm sure the surgeons have seen it before, and I don't see how it would change the mechanics of the surgery, Though this would be less relevant after surgery, a common testosterone blocker taken along with estrogen when testes are still present (spironolactone) is a diuretic so that could be used to explain problems with control. It's worth considering what time frame you are thinking of for becoming incontinent. It sounds like you are just realizing you're trans. Good for you! However, many people are unaware of the process to actually get to surgery. Maybe you've looked into it already. Generally all insurances (if you insurance covers it) and most surgeons will require 12 months of continous hormone therapy and 12 months of continous "real life experience" (social transition.) Beginning hormones may be more or less difficult depending on your area of the country, and there's often a long wait time for surgeries. This means that surgery is likely years away. If you want to be incontinent sooner than that, you should keep that in mind. There's actually an oddly high prevalence of trans women in the ABDL community, if that means anything to you. TL;DR I don't know why you would request diapers from your doctor or why your doctor would be suspicious of your motives. Having bottom surgery would provide a potential, if rare, reason for incontinence. Being incontinent shouldn't prevent you from getting surgery.
  3. I suspect that the person may not have been super familiar with the terms and thought that "ageplay" meant pedophilia. (The "dom" part of daddy-dom-litte-girl generally implies consenting adults whereas "ageplay" might be misinterpreted as "people of different ages" if someone didn't know or care to learn about the cgl/ageplay/abdl communities.) I believe there are some pedophile "communities" (NOMAPs) online that commission art so that they aren't breaking laws. The person might've thought that "ageplay" was a name for this.
  4. A bit late to the party here but I thought I'd mention that no surgeon would operate on you to prevent infections unless they knew the cause and source. Surgery obviously increases the risk for serious infections, and if the source was not in your testes then the problem could still reoccur and/or infect the healing surgical site. If you were really, really, really into this for kink reasons you could look into website/info for people with castration fetishes (they'd have way more info on surgeons that would do this than trans people would, because the system for trans surgery is highly structured and definitely not open to non-trans people) and bank sperm. However, it doesn't sound like you want to do this for any reason other than to avoid the three infections you have had, and there are medically so many better solutions than going through the long, difficult, painful, and disruptive process of surgery. I'd definitely see a urologist because if your doctor was diagnosing this definitively as UTIs and not referring you to a urologist, kidney specialist, etc after you got to the point of literally suggesting cutting off your balls then I'd have serious questions about his competence.
  5. I was thinking more of primary care doctors. Like imagine you've been seeing the same one for years and then one day you show up in a diaper. Hospital docs are more likely to not care.
  6. I feel a that one glaring reason is missing here- cost. Diapers (especially good ones) are not cheap. Being 24/7 is often 5+ dollars a day, based on what which diapers you wear, how much urine your body produces, and costs of wipes, powders, creams, etc. And to the people who argue "you save money on plumbing costs!" Well, not really. A gallon of municipal water is a fraction of a cent and most modern toilets require around 5 (or less) to flush, which doesn't even compare to the costs of diapers. So there are many people who would love to be 24/7 but can't afford to or can't justify the cost on a limited budget. Another small reason is healthcare providers. Most doctors are going to assume that you have a serious health issue that needs to be fixed. Might not be a fun conversation.
×
×
  • Create New...