Videodrome5

Yes, a guy would be arrested. As for the diaper, I'm glad that whenever stuff like this is done they often use a medical diaper because I heavily prefer them over printed diapers, but I don't think the diaper construction is at fault. It looks like she only taped the top tape perhaps, leaving the rest canted downward.

Anytime you come across one of these types of things from people who aren't into this, they're either wearing a pull-up and calling it a diaper, or they don't tape the diaper correctly. I'm not sure why it was so difficult for her to tape it on. It looks ridiculous and is annoying more than anything.

Too bad. She and/or those behind it probably nixed going that far due to the predictable, uninformed reactions they knew it would receive. She hasn't been shy about sensationalizing her sexuality (she sold her bathwater), but maybe that would have been a bit much.

Their YouTube channel is very active, and it's crazy how they heavily lean into the fact that they are "diapers", saying it at every opportunity. As a company they acknowledge fetishists in a way that no other "medical" diaper manufacturer does. I'm curious whether any fetishism on their side, including potentially of the lead "host"/marketing girl in the videos, is the impetus for this.

Went to it last night. Just from a fetish perspective, it was a disappointment. If you're into infantilism, some aspects might be interesting, but the diaper stuff is almost non-existent. The female protagonist is captured, and after she is already put in a baby doll dress off-screen and wakes in a rocking crib that's too big for her, she confronts the killer. I assume she wears no diaper at that point because for some reason she suddenly pees on the floor while standing and is picked up and put on the kitchen table. The mute killer removes some sodden undergarment which is only shown in a split second as she throws it on the floor (looks bigger than women's panties), then she goes to the kitchen cabinet and gets what looks like a cloth diaper, but it's shown so quickly and the lighting is so bad, I'm not even sure if it could be some kind of pull-up pants. The woman quickly reacts to looking at the diaper, backing up on the table and saying "No, no, I don't need that!" before submitting after a pacifier is put in and not wanting to antagonize the killer. Then only her face is shown as she is diapered. Later, after she is running from one of the killer's lunges, it appears like she removes the diaper and throws it at a door. It's so quick and the lighting so bad that I couldn't tell whether she lifted her skirt and showed it or not. So I was hoping for a bit more diaper stuff. The movie itself was pretty bad - poor story/concept and execution. I often watch low-budget horror movies, but this is one of the lesser ones I have viewed, at least at the theater, in the past few years.

I don't consider a pull-up a "diaper", but those who aren't in tune with the distinctions do. It definitely seemed like a few decades ago, the conversation around lighter bladder problems had the solution being Poise pads or something similar. Today the main solution seems to be pull-ups marketed as absorbent "underwear", something that carries more of the stigma of being "diaper-like". They are marketed to younger women and feature them in their ads. The Depend ad that has been running for a couple years (actually just spotted it on a commercial in a restaurant yesterday) with the "say 'yes' to more things" concept shows an actress who couldn't be older than 30.

Hopefully you all will go to it in the theater. It doesn't matter that it might be bad; any scale and type of movie deserves to be viewed in the theater, or we won't have theaters anymore. I've been trying to stay away from exact descriptions and reviews, but I've spotted a couple mentions, and as long as it's got at least something diaper related that doesn't involve only male actors, that's exciting enough for me from a fetish perspective. The AB stuff isn't for me, but if diapers are involved in any way, yes.

Thanks for the info, which you could have delivered in a less snarky way. In general I try to avoid reviews. I still predict that it won't be a satisfying film from a fetishist's perspective because it's unlikely someone would finance that. I'd be surprised if it were disposable diapers and not exaggerated cloth diapers.

Probably all pull-ups, not diapers.

I'll bet any money that the only actors in diapers will be guys, not the lead female. This seems close to the plot of "Barbarian".

I realize this is a long shot, but what the hell, right? I'm a 37 year old diaper lover who is looking to meet a female (genuine female only) for some diaper fun. I'm more interested in diapering you than being diapered. Diaper munches and parties, which are mostly populated by men, don't interest me in the least, so personal ads for me are the only way to meet anyone. This is something I've wanted for years and I actually came close a few months ago. We got to the meeting in person stage, then she flaked on me. Needless to say, that really sucked, hurt very much and left me feeling disrespected and deflated. It's hard to get back on the horse again after such a disappointment. I'd love to talk to any local woman who is interested, and we can discuss specifics such as backgrounds and goals.

Well, the flat fact is that this probably was not a woman, but a man getting his rocks off. Women simply do not post diaper ads on Craigslist. I've tried for a few years and only ever got one woman to reply. We corresponded for over a month, met in person to break the ice (so I knew she was real) and set plans to meet at her place. She flaked on me two days prior which REALLY sucked, giving what was likely a BS excuse. However, she did say that she had tried posting a CL ad and gotten ten replies in one day before someone flagged it because she didn't include a photo and it was removed.

I doubt very much that it is Amanda Seyfried in the photo. It just doesn't seem likely. That woman in the photo is a little thicker than Amanda, too. Why would she be calling herself a "pretty woman"? That's a bit vain even for an actress. I agree, though, that it does throw you when someone attractive makes an obviously fetish-y comment, or at least something that can be related to a fetish. If she were to keep bring up diapers, then my radar would be raised that she might have a fascination/nascent fetish for it. I'll have to make a separate post sometime about Sara Fletcher ("Secret Girlfriend"), a lesser known actress whom I consider possibly the most gorgeous actress currently working. She's brought up diapers several times in her postings (even joking(?) that she should switch to them) and has a clear fascination with childlike stuff. I'm unaware of other female celebrities who have joked about diapers.

I'd like to try Depend again. How does the new "Protection with Tabs" differ from older versions, if at all (e.g., thicker, crinklier)?

I doubt that Howard has a personal "thing" for diapers. He just likes to put women in embarrassing and nutty situations. He's done several shows where guests wore diapers, and one time the whole cast wore them under their clothes to find out what it would be like to wet them. I believe Howard just couldn't get past the physical part and be able to pee, but Jackie and I believe Baba Booey did. Robin demurely wore hers under her clothes and I don't believe she peed. Other times he had two women wear diapers because they wanted something -- one woman wanted her boyfriend's band's tape played, and another wanted to meet the Backstreet Boys. Then on another episode he asked some porn stars to compete in a contest to hold their piss the longest. He gave them a kiddie pool to pee in when they were ready, but the porn actresses weren't down for anything. He offered them diapers and again they balked. Unfortunately, Baba Booey again got in a diaper and participated. I haven't listened to his show since he departed the free airwaves, so I don't know if he's done more stuff since.