The title is Preaching to the Perverted and it was a UK comedy in 1997. It's also the last film of the 20th century to have been banned in Ireland so it may be a bit challenging to find via normal channels.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
Posted 03 December 2011 - 03:20 AM
The title is Preaching to the Perverted and it was a UK comedy in 1997. It's also the last film of the 20th century to have been banned in Ireland so it may be a bit challenging to find via normal channels.
#2
Posted 03 December 2011 - 08:26 AM
#3
Posted 03 December 2011 - 03:09 PM
I hate that, I'm not like that, and of the few AB's and DL's I have met were not like that either.
I just happen to be a guy who occasionally wears a diaper, and dresses for bed in the warmest most comfortable pajamas ever know to man.
Can you tell I have a love for sleepers?
#4
Posted 03 December 2011 - 03:39 PM
#5
Posted 04 December 2011 - 08:04 AM
For some reason when people try to shine a light on our little fetish they seem to show AB's as nut cases.
A Dirty Shame pretty much portrayed every fetishist like that. The entire premise of the movie is ludicrous on its face (concussions turn people into raving sex maniacs).
#6
Posted 04 December 2011 - 03:20 PM
#7
Posted 04 December 2011 - 04:53 PM
A Dirty Shame pretty much portrayed every fetishist like that. The entire premise of the movie is ludicrous on its face (concussions turn people into raving sex maniacs).
Well it is John Waters, who I normally like, but that movie played more like John Waters just found Urban Dictionary than anything more interesting. I'd rather watch just about any other John Waters film. Maybe it's because I've been online since the early 90s but A Dirty Shame was pretty boring to me unfortunatly. I like the wackiness of the concept but it didn't go nearly far enough.
In Progress:
Red and White
Random Fragments
Incomplete:
Empty Rooms
The Dangers of Protecting
#8
Posted 06 January 2012 - 07:35 PM
Well it is John Waters, who I normally like, but that movie played more like John Waters just found Urban Dictionary than anything more interesting. I'd rather watch just about any other John Waters film. Maybe it's because I've been online since the early 90s but A Dirty Shame was pretty boring to me unfortunatly. I like the wackiness of the concept but it didn't go nearly far enough.
I agree - he had opportunities to do much more interesting things than he did. The campy stereotype overload was fun, but it didn't have enough gas on its own to last the entire 90 or so minutes.
#9
Posted 06 January 2012 - 07:46 PM
but just showing someone participating in a fetish doesn't actually show a 'nutcase'... i mean any picture of someone engaged in a fetish could then be said to only show 'the crazies' or the 'extremists'... but its just a snapshot moment..... thats comical.
#10
Posted 07 January 2012 - 09:06 AM
#11
Posted 07 January 2012 - 11:12 AM
I just have to say, a grown adult in a diaper, and baby clothing with a pacifier in their mouth playing with baby toys IS amusing... just sit back and picture the visual.... take say your boss, or your neighbor... now picture them sitting on the floor in a diaper with a tee shirt and a pacifier... and forget for a minute that you enjoy that... adn see it how your boss or neighbor would see it.. it IS visually comical to see... just like seeing two furries scritching or wahtever IS comical when you take it at face value for its visual effect.......
but just showing someone participating in a fetish doesn't actually show a 'nutcase'... i mean any picture of someone engaged in a fetish could then be said to only show 'the crazies' or the 'extremists'... but its just a snapshot moment..... thats comical.
Well, fetishes can also be shown exaggerated to the point of silliness too - just by showing the most extreme cases and behaviors. This, however, is true of any aspect of life in general, that something completely innocuous can be made to look "crazy" just by reductio ad absurdium treatment...
#12
Posted 07 January 2012 - 12:49 PM
#13
Posted 07 January 2012 - 06:13 PM
#14
Posted 07 January 2012 - 10:20 PM
wait isn't that what i was just saying... that they were showing fetishes to the point of being comical?
I got the impression you were inferring that the fetishes themselves looked comical to someone not into them, even when being practiced normally?
#15
Posted 07 January 2012 - 11:13 PM
THAT IS COMICAL!!!! step back from the feelings this whole thing gives you and see it for what it is... a fat hairy dude dressed up as a baby....
so yes i was saying that these fetish's look comical, and that the media will use more 'extreme' cases i.e. the man in the full out baby doll dress with the pacifier is often considered more extreme than just a guy who enjoys a diaper.... the more money one puts into a fetish the more extreme it is usually considered... well that and plastering your face all over the internet dressed as a baby girl can also be considered one who is 'extreme'
but yeah ... i was saying its funny to see people engaged in lots of different fetish's....
#16
Posted 08 January 2012 - 02:01 AM
To be frank, we are.
#17
Posted 08 January 2012 - 11:51 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users







