Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

bookem

Members
  • Posts

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Diapers
    Diaper Lover
  • I Am a...
    Boy

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Southern California
  • Real Age
    41

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

bookem's Achievements

Toddler

Toddler (3/7)

11

Reputation

  1. gotdiapers: Wow, that's quite the supportive attitude to have! Damn, didn't your mom/dad/authoritative figure ever tell you that "... if you don't have anything nice to say, then don't say anything at all..?" Whats your passion? Collecting stamps, building miniature railroads, working out in the gym? Whatever it is, someone could see it as a waste of time, but its something you enjoy, so why not? But hey, to each his own... To the OP: Good luck! I hope you find it's everything you want it to be and more! I commend you on your courage to embark on such a journey.
  2. Yeah, no worries. And to be completely honest, I've never had a cath of any sort. I was more curious then anything. =)
  3. Great stuff! Thanks again for all the input. I'm pretty sure I want to go with VMWare for a few reasons. 1) track record: its the big guy in the room and has been round for quite a while with great success. Not saying Hyper-v isn't as good, it just hasn't been implemented as much as VMWare, and there has to be a good reason for that. 2) support: Since its so commonly used, it will be easier to find support should I ever need it. And 3) Scalability. Chances are my environment and system demands may change here pretty soon and I'll need to be ready for it. The two server config is a really good thought. I'll look into it and see if i can squeeze it into my budget.
  4. Yeah, you nailed it BoToX. For me it was the fact that the cath is all internal, and nothing but two little strings that come out. I wonder if with this method there is lesser risk of UTI since there is some closure. Less chance for stuff to flow back in I guess is what Im thinking. I could be completely wrong.
  5. Thanks for everyone's replies. I will most definitely have a ton of ram available. The hardware I'm looking into is a pretty stout Dell R710 server, loaded up with dual processors, and 32 gigs of ram, with a PowerVault MD3220i for storage of the VM's, Database, etc... That should be more then sufficient to run the 3 or 4 servers I want, right?
  6. For me personally, I'd only want to try something like this for a long weekend or something, not for weeks. No thank you! I was just exploring the thought is all. Maybe it could be useful to someone here, so I thought I'd share.
  7. I have these three aging servers that I would like to consolidate into one physical box. I don't really want to convert what I currently have into Virtual Machines's, since they were here before I was and I want to start from scratch so I know exactly what is going into them. I would like to get one powerful box, and break it out into 4 Windows Server 2008 VM's. One would be used for the Domain Controller, DNS, Application, File and Print server. The second would be used just as a web server using IIS - which I have to use as that is what is required by our application vendor. Third would be just the SQL server. And the fourth would be used as my XMPP, Fax, and email server. The DC would obviously be part of the domain since its controlling it. I would keep the web server, and the xmpp/fax/email server outside of the domain, preferably separated from the domain with a firewall. Is it best practice to keep the SQL server outside or part of the domain? Just to give you an idea of what I'm working with, it’s a business with 10 workstations, all in one building. Each is constantly using an application which queries the SQL database, all day, every day. The planning stage is in its infancy at this point, but with has been stated, am I on the right track? What would you recommend for hardware for something like this? Any other advice, recommendations? Below is the current setup and what I want to do. Server 1 ------------- Processor: Intel P4 2.4GHz Memory: 1GB OS: Windows 2000 Server Responsibilities: - Domain Controller - DNS - Application Server - SQL (SQL Server 2000) - File Server - Print Server Server 2 -------------- Processor: AMD Athlon 64 3400+ 2.2GHz Memory: 1GB OS: Windows Server 2003 Responsibilities: - Web server (IIS) - Email Server for the online payment system Note: This server is not part of the domain, but has a user to read the SQL database on "Server 1" for an online payment system. Server 3 ---------------- Processor: Intel Xeon 2.8GHz Memory: 1GB OS: Windows Server 2003 Responsibilities: - XMPP Server - Fax Server - Secondary Email Server Note: This server is not part of the domain Thanks!
  8. For me its simply a comfort, control and protection thing. Those three items come up with all my fetishes it seems.
  9. Under my sink in the bathroom as well as in my closet on the shelf. I dont have a huge supply, so its not a lot to store.
  10. Sexy? Humm, not so much. Its more of a comfort thing for me. I feel comfortable and confident when wearing.
  11. Im about 45 minutes from you Tailie
  12. I was looking around online tonight and came across this really interesting catheter, the Urovalve Surinate Bladder Management system. Its like a half catheter that goes into your bladder and stops right about where the pubic wall is. There is a check valve built into it, that uses a magnet to release the check valve to allow the flow of urine. I've read discussions in the past about people having the idea of using a stent or something like that in both the bladder and external sphincter to bypass the ability to clench. So here's my thought, what if there was a way to disable the check-valve and still allow the catheter to sit in there and allow the urine to flow constantly. I wanted to share this with the group and get some feed back on what you think. Here is the website, with all the information on what it is and how it works. There is even a cool little video describing it. http://anonym.to/?http://www.urovalve.com/technology.php So, what do you think? Could it be modified to give the temporary incontinence that so many desire? Id love to hear your feedback. Thanks.
  13. Unseendl, well said. I think you plan is well thought out, and if its something you feel that strongly about doing then do it. Why should you have to live in the "what if..." question of life? Go for it, no regrets and if you find its not something you wanted down the road, you can deal with it then. Sorry, I don't have any insight on the original question of what tests are involved, since I've never encountered or read about it.
  14. Thanks for posting! I always love reading full time wearers experiences. Keep it up! Eager eyes await your next post
  15. Sweet! Good to see that there are others on this board that ride =) BBB, where u from? We should go ride some time since you're not too far away!
×
×
  • Create New...