Little BabyDoll Christine

Let's do it again

I re-registered at the DNS about a week ago This is so alien, what do I tell my webhost?

Thanks. Now at lteast we are getting somewhere. Could this also be at my DNS because I just re-upped with them? This does not happen when I open the link

Images with HTTPS EVERTHING out With it in This time, I will add the "s" to the address I does not bring up the image

I don't know who this is on. We're both using FireFox, and a person is entitled to use such security as they see fit. I will try an experiment. I will put one link here with HTTPS EVERYTHING in and one with it dosabled it. So wait a half-hour or so before using any of the links in this post. Also, my browser is opening the page in a new tab http://sandralyn.net/fastnav2.html The "s" is missing thought HTTPS EVERYTHING is in HTTPS EVERTHING is now disabled http://sandralyn.net/fastnav2.html EDITED some hours later: I have tried both links, Refreshi'ing each time and I get just what the link says

I would like a link to that so I can see it for myself. I am not seeing it AT ALL It would be nice to know the OS, cybersecurity, and browser being used. For example, what if it is Win 10 (I use 11), Cybersecurity; BitDefender Free (I use MalwareBytes Premium) and browser is Chrome w/unknown addons (I use FireFox Quantum with the relevant add-ons MalwareBytes Integration and HTTPSEVERYTHING)? What can I do about the certificate of a thumbnail on a separate site that I cannot even access? What if that site left some crap on DD that affects links put here?

I'm using Widnws 11, MalwareBytes Premium, Firefox Quantum with MalwareBytes Integration and HTTPSEVERTHING. What I put in as a link is taken right from my address bar. My DNS is Register my webhost is Exmasters. How long has this been going on? I just did an automatic Re-up with my DNS CAn someone leave a link to that site here so I can look at it. None of us are geeks here and this looks like a job for one

That is just done for humiliation/domination. How pathetic must you be to be changed into a diaper that someone else wets in; even if just a little bit? or "we know who wears whose wet". This can be done some previus time and let the diaper start to smell if it is a thick diaper and will be worn for some time. Yet another thing is to change the little one for bed a couple of hours before bedtime so that the diaper will have been wet once and the little one put to bed in a wet diaper. Nothing shows disrespect like being put to bed in a wet diaper since it shows that you have such disrespect as to not change her into a dry diapers. It is usually done to a little one who is overly proud but can be done for any other of the character traits like being babyish, whiney, disobedient, overactive, forward, gossipy or trollopy as well as proud. This last is special. How can you be proud in a baby-short dress, skirt or babydoll, in thick diapers and rubber panties that will show if you move the wrong way and just everyon will want to feel them, and you smell a bit, showing you have no control over you own body?

Looking at what you were intiatied into ABDL in, vs what you are getting rid of. They are not even related. If those were all I could get, I would quit too

This convo, for some strange reason, took place in my Status Update. It appears to be a technical problem https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/index.php?/profile/27920-little-babydoll-christine/&status=38647&type=status

Well, get real diapers and rubber panties and that will cure the enui

He died of bladder cancer. not mesophelioma, which resides in the lungs. He came from Czechoslovakia and lived in Boulder, Co where he was a Professor Emeritus at the univversity there The 1980's was not the Dark Ages unless you think the CAT scanner is a medieval torture device. Statistical procedures were well validated for almost a cetury by the time I took Tests and Meeasurements in 1975 and Stat was one of Beckmann's double specialties. So he knew how to check and validate statistical material The original research that demonstrated a link between some kind of asbestos and meso was done in 1960: If the 1980's was the Dark Ages, This was the time of the pyramids. The type of aspbestos used in the Army base was pretty much a known source of trouble and was shunned as a building material. The Gvernment used it (wrongly) because it was cheap But at any rate, The ovarian cancer link to talcum that generated the furor was debunked by HAMA and I suspect this was a put-up job to salvage the situation created by the shysters who brought the cdlass-action suit, who, as late as 2022/early '23 cited "a media [sic] study" in their ad to attracts participants in the class action suit That is all I am going to say about the matter