![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
 |
 |
Bondage
Sorry I can't come out and play, I'm a bit tied up at the moment!
215 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 11.9k views
-
- 24 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 43 replies
- 9.4k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 10 replies
- 2k views
-
- 33 replies
- 27.6k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 5 replies
- 510 views
-
- 3 replies
- 617 views
-
- 0 replies
- 280 views
-
- 7 replies
- 3k views
-
- 4 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 21 replies
- 4.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 299 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 572 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 682 views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.3k views
-
Current Donation Goals
-
-
-
Posts
-
By Little Sherri · Posted
I agree this is a strange gambit to use on this chessboard - some people still speak in terms of Rearz being disreputable because of it, although if they'd shot someone instead, they'd be on parole by now, and evidently it hasn't hurt their business too much - they launch a new diaper every six weeks and they've expanded their headquarters again. But I wonder if this is also being misinterpreted - for example, ABU attempting to trademark the term BabyFur, or Rearz seeking to trademark ABDL, only really gives them dominion over the term as it applies to a specific product. So if ABU makes a diaper model called the BabyFur, then Bambino can't go produce the Bambino BabyFur, but they could still market, say, the Bambino BabyTail, and say "Attention, Babyfur's, we have the best diaper for you" in their material. They just couldn't name it the BabyFur. Chevrolet used to manufacture a model called the Baretta, way back at the dawn of time (the late 1980's), and there is an Italian gun manufacturer by that name that was founded in the 16th century. They got into a dispute over the use of the term, and the resolution ended up being that, basically, Chevrolet would only build cars, not firearms, using that name. Similarly, the name "Kodiak" is currently used by a trailer manufacturer, a boot company, a company that makes sheds, one that makes power equipment, one that makes pancake & waffle mix, and also a mining company. I could go start making Kodiak diapers, and if I sought to trademark that, it would only apply to diapers. -
.thumb.jpg.d3dd35d286a657521573a3dcb3d59e70.jpg)
-
By Little BabyDoll Christine · Posted
It would not matte to the point of approving or not. I would be what I would be. I would adapt over the years from birth to this point -
Funny, at least she did not sing “Grandma got run over by a reindeer “! -
Works for me now too, must have been a short outage. Pretty crappy.
-