Nice work if you can get it...

willnotwill · April 6, 2015

Lisa Rinna reportedly got $2 milliion for her depends commercials.

DailyDi · April 6, 2015

So much for "trying them on for charity" like they said in the ads

WBDaddy · April 7, 2015

I know "fundraisers" who donate far less than 12.5% of their take to their stated charities...

dondd · April 9, 2015

No doubt that 100% went to her favorite charity.

Darkfinn · April 23, 2015

No doubt that 100% went to her favorite charity.

JPvegas420 · April 24, 2015

Nothing wrong with working for money.

SunOfSheep · April 24, 2015

Nothing wrong with working for money.

Baby Brian · April 24, 2015

But if my net gain after expenses is zero, and it benefits everyone else by keeping me off the streets, then it technically is charity.

Bettypooh · April 24, 2015

Here in SC USA, charities can keep up to 90% of the gross income so many of them do :bash: She's probably got her "charity" based here :whistling:

kevindhca · April 25, 2015

The for charity part is referring to Kimberly-Clarke donations to the charities supported by the celebrity.

In exchange for trying the products, the company made sizable donations to the charities.

The commercials just publicize that, and the people in them would rightly expect to be well compensated for continent wide advertising.

I suspect her charitable actions far exceed the average person.

Bettypooh · April 26, 2015

kevindhca · April 26, 2015

Lol, I didn't pick up on that when I wrote it.

Recommended Posts