Guest diaperboykcmo Posted May 20, 2011 Posted May 20, 2011 First, I'd represent us better then most have. Out of all the shows I've seen regarding ab, I'm in better shape, and better looking. I know it comes across as being conceited, but the truth is the truth. Also I'd be able to articulate alot better. I've had 2 mommys, and other girls that have participated as well, feeding me a bottle, putting a diaper on me ect. Thank God! If I was to go on tv, it would get no play. Only if I was collecting disability, would anyone care. That's what this whole thing is about. Stanley collecting disability. With that I'm done with the whole subject. I believe everything has been said, that can be said. If I didn't have things going for me, thank god. I would go on tv! 1
Diapered Jason Posted May 20, 2011 Posted May 20, 2011 You would think that, but they would have attacked you for having two wives as well as having other girls involved. They would have accused you of adultery and at the same time try to comprehend what is happening to the world. Maybe some senator would have had an investigation into your tax history. It is arrogant to think of yourself as invulnerable. They would have found a way to destroy you, but you already knew that. 1
sarah_ab Posted May 20, 2011 Posted May 20, 2011 you started an entire new thread to say this when there are like four or five threads already about this particular person and their 15 min spot on a show? Sides maybe i would fine you ugly..... just because girls have slept with you doesn't mean you are attractive... girls get desparate and sleep with ugly men, just like men get desparate and sleep with less desirable women. 2
puffybedwetter Posted May 20, 2011 Posted May 20, 2011 you started an entire new thread to say this when there are like four or five threads already about this particular person and their 15 min spot on a show? Sides maybe i would fine you ugly..... just because girls have slept with you doesn't mean you are attractive... girls get desparate and sleep with ugly men, just like men get desparate and sleep with less desirable women. Nicely said, people are people. cant belive the OP comments. maybe he thinks his crap dont smell either... Like it or not OP Stanley has more balls than you. 2
Guest diaperboykcmo Posted May 20, 2011 Posted May 20, 2011 you started an entire new thread to say this when there are like four or five threads already about this particular person and their 15 min spot on a show? Sides maybe i would fine you ugly..... just because girls have slept with you doesn't mean you are attractive... girls get desparate and sleep with ugly men, just like men get desparate and sleep with less desirable women. Why are you responding! No one is going to get in your business, as long as you're not benefitting from the system. I didn't say I had 2 wives, never been married. I've had two mommys, no one would care, it's just about him being on disability, that caused the shit storm. Puff, not going to get in a pissing contest with you, I'm not ripping on Stanley. I'm saying i'm in better shape and better looking, then those that I've seen on tv, that represent us! Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Haven't you ever noticed, they never seem to get a physically shape or an attractive ab to represent us.
Guest diaperboykcmo Posted May 20, 2011 Posted May 20, 2011 You would think that, but they would have attacked you for having two wives as well as having other girls involved. They would have accused you of adultery and at the same time try to comprehend what is happening to the world. Maybe some senator would have had an investigation into your tax history. It is arrogant to think of yourself as invulnerable. They would have found a way to destroy you, but you already knew that. No man, what I'm trying to point out, is no one would care. This would not get any pub, but since he's on disability. Then the government can get involved. If I went on tv, and wasen't on disability. No one would care. Too many people are offended, cause they feel he's being picked on,for being ab! You get slammed for saying you knew this was going to happen. It was clear as day, once it was known he's on SSI, that the government can get involved.
sarah_ab Posted May 20, 2011 Posted May 20, 2011 actually i do benefit fromt he system, i am a state/federal employee, therefore your tax dollars pay my salary! thanks!
Guest diaperboykcmo Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 actually i do benefit fromt he system, i am a state/federal employee, therefore your tax dollars pay my salary! thanks! I didn't say you Sara! you started an entire new thread to say this when there are like four or five threads already about this particular person and their 15 min spot on a show? Sara for saying this, you sure keep it going! I could care less, if you're a fed employee
sarah_ab Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 wanna know the kicker my job is to approve or deny people for ssi ....
Guest diaperboykcmo Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 wanna know the kicker my job is to approve or deny people for ssi .... Not one person makes that decision! I should know, i've been going through that crap for the last 7 years. Due to my bipolar
sarah_ab Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 well no we collect medical records and write up the forms, consult with dr's when needed and then depending on the state the forms may or may not go to a doctor for a signature...
Diapered Jason Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 No man, what I'm trying to point out, is no one would care. This would not get any pub, but since he's on disability. Then the government can get involved. If I went on tv, and wasen't on disability. No one would care. Too many people are offended, cause they feel he's being picked on,for being ab! You get slammed for saying you knew this was going to happen. It was clear as day, once it was known he's on SSI, that the government can get involved. I was pointing out that no matter what you do or who you are when you go public, there are certain people who will try to demonize you. They do not even have to tell the truth. If Stanley wasn't on disability, they would have come up with something. It is what they do. This kind of rhetoric should be dismissed immediately. Yes we knew this was going to happen in some fashion and it seems they picked Stanley's SSI benefits, but we will get pass this and we should support him.
Guest diaperboykcmo Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 I was pointing out that no matter what you do or who you are when you go public, there are certain people who will try to demonize you. They do not even have to tell the truth. If Stanley wasn't on disability, they would have come up with something. It is what they do. This kind of rhetoric should be dismissed immediately. Yes we knew this was going to happen in some fashion and it seems they picked Stanley's SSI benefits, but we will get pass this and we should support him. I see what you're saying, but my point is this. There's been alot of ab's or dl's to go public, but to the best of my knowledge, no one came after them. I'm convienced, no one would care, the only reason this is a big deal, cause he's on disability.
LBG Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 I see what you're saying, but my point is this. There's been alot of ab's or dl's to go public, but to the best of my knowledge, no one came after them. I'm convienced, no one would care, the only reason this is a big deal, cause he's on disability. Actually that is false. Plenty of ABDLs who have gone on public tv have been ridiculed. There was that one man who was the heir to popular mechanics or whatever and lived full time as a baby girl. He went on Jerry Springer. He ended up being shunned and died alone. Then there is Baby Ella from Secret Lives of Women. She spoke about wearing her diaper to work at a daycare center. Some of the parents at the center saw the show and how she engaged in ABDL play. She lost her job, moved to a new town and broke up with her Daddy. People are always going to judge whoever is on tv. If it weren't for Stanley being on SSI, they would find some other reason to make fun of him.
BabyFergstar Posted May 22, 2011 Posted May 22, 2011 Yes, babies can get ridiculed and fired, but not every baby who goes on TV gets investigated by the government. I think that's what he's trying to say. Nobody important would care. That's a shame that Ella got fired from her job, but if what you say is true, she admitted to participating in an aspect of what is a sexual fetish for many people around children...can't say I'm surprised some parents took it the wrong way.
Guest Posted May 22, 2011 Posted May 22, 2011 I just like to make a point here.... with owning AB site I get many magazines/tv/radio companys always asking for there help in which personaly I decline because everytime it has gone to the press on our fetish people seem to look into it alot more then take the p*** out of us ! I run a website for my own personal use and to help others out there saying you are not alone and I am here for the support to others and with the help of donations to keep the site running.
LuvsGurl Posted May 22, 2011 Posted May 22, 2011 OK folks. Can we put this issue to rest already? I think it's been pretty well beaten into the ground. 1
Guest diaperboykcmo Posted May 23, 2011 Posted May 23, 2011 Yes, babies can get ridiculed and fired, but not every baby who goes on TV gets investigated by the government. I think that's what he's trying to say. Nobody important would care. That's a shame that Ella got fired from her job, but if what you say is true, she admitted to participating in an aspect of what is a sexual fetish for many people around children...can't say I'm surprised some parents took it the wrong way. Yes you understand what I was saying. not every baby who goes on TV gets investigated by the government
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now