babysamantha Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 no why should employers dictate our private lives as long as it is between two consenting adults 1 Link to comment
WBDaddy Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 Love how this is phrased. Sorry, but an employment arrangement is a voluntary contract between two consenting parties. If you go on national TV in ANY capacity that doesn't relate to your job, and the result brings negative publicity to your place of work, then if I'm your employer, I'm going to politely explain to you that you are now costing me more money than you are making me by working for me and wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors. Link to comment
Saschadzg Posted September 15, 2016 Author Share Posted September 15, 2016 This is bigotry. The actor of a Sex TV show is not worse than the spectator, even, when it is the human resource director.. Link to comment
WBDaddy Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 So you're saying you advocate for business owners to be forced by the government to keep employees that destroy their business with unnecessary negative publicity. Link to comment
Little BabyDoll Christine Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 I see someone with an axe to grind; always adding a new wrinkle to the discussion It is obviously the job of an actor in a Sex TV show to demonstrate the subject matter. So firing her for doing her job strickes me as counter-productive Link to comment
Elfy Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 It depends. If they wear to work one day and someone spots a Tena waistband then probably not. The manager doesn't know the personal situation or anything and should probably leave it alone unless it becomes a repeating problem... Someone's waistband appears once a year and you can overlook it, someone doing it several times a day and it becomes an issue. If you work with food and a manager noticed you are wearing could cause a hygiene issue. I'm not an expert but that would seem like legitimate reason to move someone away from food handling and to another department. Working with kids is always the iffy one... On the surface there is nothing wrong with it and yet it is a fear I think many have that they are discovered wearing. I don't think it should be an issue in that circumstance but it would be if discovered. I think this is less to do with what most ABDLs think "you are wearing a nappy around kids, you must be a pedo" or something like that and more to do with the fact that a teacher is bringing their fetish or alternative lifestyle into an environment full of kids who don't need/want to know about your private life and yes, wearing nappies to a teaching job would be grounds for termination if I was the person in charge. Obviously this changes if you are incontinent, in that scenario you will probably have told your bosses about your requirements and it is no longer a kink thing, it is a medical thing. It also depends on level of exposure. If someone catches a glance at a waistband or hears some tapes in the bathroom, that is one thing. It is a very different thing to deliberately flaunt your lifestyle. Talking about it loudly or often, wearing things inappropriate for your age and job and anything like that would get you kicked out ASAP since it shows you can't separate work and personal life. It is about being sensible. I think most people could wear to work without being discovered, I know I did it a lot when I worked and I don't think people knew what I was doing. If they did know, because I didn't make a song and dance out of it, neither did they. But I knew that when I wore to work that I was creating a risk for myself. Employers are within their rights to fire anyone if they think their personal lives are interfering with the job. Someone is on the phone to his girlfriend all day? Fired. Someone keeps showing up late? Fired. Someone who wears their alternative lifestyle clothes to work? Fired. It doesn't matter whether or not the nappies actually affect your performance, it is the separation of work and personal life that would concern most employers more. 1 Link to comment
FretaBWet Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 The easy answer to your question is no, they should not be fired for what they did on their own time. That doesn't change the fact that depending on location they can be fired and will probably be fired. It's not just AB/DL which can get you discriminated against. Smoking Marajuana is legal in Colorado in the U.S. but if your employer drug tests you and finds you had used it legally they can still fire you. It doesn't matter that you used it on your own time outside of work, they can still fire you. if you choose to go on TV as an AB/DL knowing they can fire you and will probably fire you then you shouldn't expect sympathy. You made a choice, you live with the consequences of that choice. Hugs, Freta Link to comment
Nat Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 I don't care what you do in your personal life, if you choose to make it public and if it's going to cost me my business reputation, I will let you go for the sake of my income. Link to comment
DL4LIFE Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 With a resounding fuck yeah! Having a job and a paycheck from an employer is a privilege not a right. It is your privilege not the employer's. Link to comment
Snugglebear_69 Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 I work in human resources and I'll give the standard HR answer "it depends". If you make a conscious decision to go on national television and make a spectacle out of yourself and it negatively affects the company then yes you should be fired. Look at the case of the employee at the sports event who yelled FHRITP and was caught on camera. It caused a lot of negative publicity and he was fired. That's called accountability. He made a stupid 2 Link to comment
drynot Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 That's what I like about Canada. Link to comment
Snugglebear_69 Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 That's not actually true about Canada. Look at PSLREB decisions and jurisprudence and you'll see multiple cases of terminations for off work behaviour that isn't illegal. Granted these are public servant cases but it isn't correct to say there would be a shit storm as it happens a lot more than one night think. Honestly most HR professionals would avoid a case like a diaper wearing employee like the plague. Good HR would not be advising any form of conversation with the employee unless there had been some form of hygiene or safety complaint. This of course assumes the employee is covering their diaper appropriately. Link to comment
turtlepins Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 First, even though I love my AB side, I would never make a choice to act out publicly anything that would cause a negative effect on my family or job. Link to comment
DL4LIFE Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 Ppl have been getting fired for posting stupid shit Link to comment
rosalie.bent Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 There have been some excellent responses in this thread. I am not surprised at all since most people on this site are pretty clever and well-grounded. I can bet however, that if you posed this question on Fetlife you would get an absolute storm of screaming people demanding their 'right' to do whatever they want, wherever they want and screw the rest of the population. I also note that a large number of these people are Link to comment
runtor86 Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 Of course not, one must distinguish job of privacy. One can be an excellent employee even if they are ABDL. But many are governed by prejudice and ignorance unfortunately. Link to comment
Nat Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 56 minutes ago, drynot said: Obviously you wouldn't fire someone with an actual medical condition that made diapers necessary. Link to comment
rosalie.bent Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 2 minutes ago, Spokane Girl said: I am sure those people would still hide their diapers and not expose them to everyone at work. I am also sure they don't go out in public wearing only a diaper. Link to comment
Nat Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 10 minutes ago, rosalie.bent said: The vast majority of incontinent people who are not elderly or disabled in other ways wear their diapers without another person ever finding out. And if there is a mistake and they do get discovered, absolutely no one would say a word. I know, I was being a little sarcastic because the poster compared ABDLs to incontinence. But still, an incontinent Link to comment
DL4LIFE Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 17 minutes ago, Spokane Girl said: I know, I was being a little sarcastic because the poster compared ABDLs to incontinence. But still, an incontinent Link to comment
rosalie.bent Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 23 minutes ago, Spokane Girl said: I know, I was being a little sarcastic because the poster compared ABDLs to incontinence. But still, an incontinent Link to comment
WBDaddy Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 17 minutes ago, rosalie.bent said: I can only think of pole dancer. A smart club owner would absolutely feature an incontinent chick onstage. 1 Link to comment
rosalie.bent Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 10 minutes ago, WBDaddy said: A smart club owner would absolutely feature an incontinent chick onstage. Link to comment
WBDaddy Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Yeah, not my idea of a good time either. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now