Chastizement Diapers: Thick Or Thin?

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

The difference between diaper punishment and diaper chastizement is that the one is for a longer time than the other, At least a week

This is more of an issue with us girls because you just know that during that time, your dresses will be much shorter with fuller skirts so we will be easier to change. Although it is pretty scary for boys but in a different way

Now, if you are a baby, being laid down and your skirt lifted by Mommy, or other lady means nothing to you but if you are 4 or older then you know how this makes you feel

Part of diaper chastizement is being changed in front of others. Mommy knows how you feel about having your skirt lifted and someone see that you are in rubber panties. or how you feel when others see your panties drying over the tub or Mommy starts talking about them. Do you know what it is like being changed in front of one of your friends or a favorite teacher? or a hated enemy who you just know will tell everyone "You should have seen what I saw happen to Linda..." and you just know the others will just eat it up

Now, here is Mommy's dilemma. If she puts you in thick diapers, you are very aware of them between your legs and she can always tell the others that you are a heavy wetter, which is humiliating. On the other hand, Thinner diapers means you will have to be changed more often so persons will see you being laid down, your skirt lifted and all the rest more often and maybe make some remark to your Mommy or Nursie about how cute your rubber panties are or how they sympathize with her for having a child that needs diapers and rubber panties at her age all of which means you do a lot more crying. One nasty thing Mommmy would do is not change you until she got to the place she was visiting and then the first thing she would do is change you

Of course, boys are not immune to this kind of thing. When I was little, if you wanted to skare the daylights out of a 6 year old boy, all you had to do ways bring up the subject of a "diaper and pink rubber panteis; just like your sister's" but for girls it was less visceral and much deeper. I think for boys, it meant that they were either sissies or being turned inot girls and baby girls at that

Which would you think is worse being put in thick diapers or thin once and be changed more often?

[BabyLock]

Another way to look at thin versus thick - With thin diapers (maybe 1 or 2) the dress/skirt will not billow out so much; think petticoat effect.

The diapers will not be as obvious unless bending over or sitting.

Now with thick diapers (thinking heavy duty ones 3 or more) then the skirt is really going to blossom out and there will be no avoiding the

showing prominent display of the diapers; diaper cover with or without the frilly ruffles; plastic/rubber of any color - of course PINK is preferred !

That is all well and good. For younger girls such clothing is not such a big deal. Now dress the teenager young miss and there is going to

be some red faced embarassment. Take this another step to a young adult miss and there is going to be some very very wild overtures !

Now as for boys-young men - one could always esculate the senario and wear little girls dresses; skirts; petticoats; babydolls; etc.

OR possibly consider a flannel onesie with cartoon characters; short sailor suit with oversize room in the waist thru the crotch with snap

closing; a bibbed apron jean shorts with snap crotch always sized to show the diapers underneath; or just simply a very short 'T' shirt

that does not tuck into the oversize diaper and diaper cover with pastel colors - essentially "PINK" for maximum effect !

AND don't forget the pacifier clipped onto the outfit of choice.

Ribbons in the hair; mary jane shoes; frilly sox; white tights and I always like to top off my assembly with a "Locking Diaper Cover"

and mittens to prevent unauthorized removal of the aforementioned !

Call it what you want Diaper Chastizement or Diaper Punishment it can be a provocative statement !

Enjoy;

BabyLock

[Diapered Jason]

I really like this thread. I agree with Babylock that that is where the fun is. If they are really naughty, take that pacifier clip and attach it to their nipples. You can bet he/she won't lost the pacifier then.

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

The dress is usually fairly high-waisted and has a full skirt to begin with so no matter how thick the diaper, It wil not matter. Those had been around for ages 3 and up forever; I saw them in nursery school before I was 5. Also the skirt to be significant needs to cover the panties ordinarily albeit just barely. Otherwise it is not a dress or skirt, it is just a top or "blouse". Even the original babydoll was about halfway to the knee The idea was to make the girl have to be aware that her rubber panties would show if she were sloppy about her movements. The original babydoll consisted of a short dress with a "waist" that ran from anywhere from just under the arm to just above the nippeles with some fullness and flair to it, and a full panty that was made to look like the full rubber panties. These were not the slutty things that you see today, they were made to be cute. Hence a "baby doll"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babydoll

They were around long before the movie. It is just that the movie made the name more fomralized and the item more of a "set [matched dress and panty]" in 1951, 2 or 3, it was just the dress or nightdress and was pretty much a thing worn with diapers or like that

You did not have to be a teenager to find this undesirable, any girl over 4 would. Also there were no tights until later. That would be pointless. the rubber panties went right over the diaper so if you were put in anything over that then there was no danger of the rubber panties being seen. if you put the rubber panties over the tights, they would be in contact with the diaers and get wet. Also visually, the thickness of the diaper did not matter since rubber panties were always very full cut

[diaperedandspanked]

Being changed in front of others would be much more humiliating than just being seen wearing a thick diaper. Especially when your legs are lifted by mommy when she wipes you down to get you nice and clean.

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

With the original baby doll the skirt was long enough and full enough so that one coudl be changed with the dress down but there was always the idea that it could be lifted easily

There is much misunderstanding of things when they are interpreted by persons of a later time who did not see them and who were not treated as girls but who have some second-hand ideas of what it was like

[Diapered Jason]

Also, with the thicker diaper, make sure that the mommy does frequent diaper checks by lifting the skirt so everyone can see. Then the mommy should announce to everyone the state of the diaper.

[claire claire]

i prefer thick diaper

[BabyJune]

Wait a minute! Diapers used as punishment? I thought potty training was the punishment.

[Bonsai]

The other variable factor is how much the baby has to drink. There are therefore 4 permutations:

1. Little drink with thin diapers. Probably the lightest form of punishment, with changes not-so-frequent but also no big problems of concentrated urine getting stale.

2. Little drink with thick diapers. While changing embarassment is here reduced to the minimum, the diapers can become really unconfortable. Bad smell granted. If unproperly managed, this option presents high risk of diaper rash.

3. Lots of fluids with thin diapers. LEAKAGE ALERT!!! Baby will be always very worried about the results of his uncontrollable floodings and wet spots and puddles will add plenty of humiliation. While pee is not so smelly thanks to the low concentration, soon enough all baby's clothing will begin to have a slight smell of toilet that will make it very hard to pass unnoticed.

4. Lots of fluids with thick diapers. The funny part here is to mock the "big wetter". Changes are frequent enough and, considering how huge thick diapers can become with low-concentration urine, very embarassing. It's also probably the best way to potty-untrain your toddler.

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

Where did "his" become any major part of this?

Do not even think about anything that has the slightest chance of leaking. That reflects not on the Little Girl, but on Mommy and she does not want to wear out her welcome. So using thin diapers in that way might get her told, that since she knows her little girl is a heavy wetter why does she not have the sense to dress her right. Beyond that being "checked" is part of it. Mommy puts her hand up under or lifts, the skrt and between the diaper and rubber panties, often in a showy manner

This kind of thing was done for special reasons: whininess/babyishness ("If you want to act like a baby, that is what you will be"), being "overactive", being forward, gossipy, trollopy ("I can make me dress go this high" or the like), disobedient and especially being proud. The idea of the short dress is to make the Little Girl have to make some effort to keep her rubber panties from showing and preserve some dignity. It was usually the case theat the rubber panties were talked about more than the diapers since that is what was seen whereas the diaper was only implied

I have not seen this kind of thing done with little boys, only threatened. There were worries that it might sissify them. Also this was at a time when it was considered wront to spank or hit girls. There was also the perceived benefit of teaching her to pay attention to her skirts so that in later life she would not be trollopy