Francine took plenty of pictures and sent them over to her editor, then she got herself changed into a clean diaper, and went to check on her little girl. She smiled when she saw the girl face down, butt up. That could really only mean one thing... So Francine checked the damage, and it was big! She giggled quietly and began to play with it a bit, amazed by the size. If only she wasn't so shy, Francine would show her off to her whole fanbase!

As she was left alone to rest, the laxatives starting taking effect. In her sleep, Dahlia adjusted herself for the most comfortable messing position as she then started to push out a big old mess! Her diaper slowly expanded in size, the writing on the back stretching out with it. By the time she was done, it was at pretty much max capacity!

Francine laid the girl down on the bed, then she began to massage the girl's scalp, humming softly as she did so. She wanted to spoil this girl with affection, and a gentle move like this was perfect for before nap time! She heard the girl yawn, and watched her eyes struggle to stay open, finding it just about the most adorable thing she had ever seen. Then at long last, the little baby fell asleep, and Francine went to take some pictures to post on her site for the day. 

@Brown Owl I don't know to much about the old site, or what happened.  (Other than what was posted). I understand that management was a little crazy on the old site, and that mods had the power to use to delete/lock threads that they thought were "not kosher" but they did NOT use their power to do that, because they would get grief for doing it.  A Mod/Admin SHOULD be able to, and DOES have the ability to do that - There are many times where you would have to moderate threads:  Failure to do that because someone tells you that "You'd better have justification for each one you deleted" is ridiculous:  If there are users that you have to speak to or deal with, you CAN do it, and you DO have the justification for doing so. Being the owner of 5 domains and my own server, and having to do work as an admin, I KNOW that having the power to manipulate users, files, directories, web content and system maintenance, I only use the power of root when and IF I need to do work as the superuser:  other than those times when my terminal reads: "root@cardinal:/#". My user account 'brian@cardinal~$" is used, and 'sudo' prefixes most of the commands that need root permissions. (I also learned to be CAREFUL with permissions, because once from my Tallahassee Free-Net terminal shell I did "chmod 000" which LOCKED me out of my directory, and the admin had to set my directory "chmod 755 /home/bsbaker.") I have learned much since that mistake a LONG time ago:  You use your power when you need it, and you only use enough of a deterrent to correct errant behavior:  for example:  we would ban a user from an IRC channel for a few minutes to a max of 24 hours, then allow them back, and each time they did bad things, we would up the punishment, and the ULTIMATE punishment that we would use would be a /KILL <user> [REASON] If they continue you would KILL LINE the user@host or user@IP.  The ban of the IRC user would be dependent on the admins or the server IRC Operators:  whoever bans someone decides the length of the ban, and whether it would be removed, and the admins or the user that did the ban would be responsible for UNDOING it:  we RESPECTED that, because Opers had a reason for the ban.  If a user was doing things that would be a detriment to the system or the users, we could DELETE the users account, and that would be an Admin decision, and it was only used in the most dire of situations, where someone had something in their home directory that they shouldn't, or if they ran C scripts like flash.c (that, when run, would flash the screen of the whole IRC server, OR when someone was connected to TFN as a user which meant NO ONE could see anything, and it messed up the screen of everyone on the server. I would have banned the idiots that were causing the problems, and delete the stories that are of questionable nature, because that is the right thing to do.  If you are only dealing with "'Half a Dozen Users'" THEY should be the ones that get the ban hammer.  From 1995-2007, I was an IRC Operator, and I remember one dude that was breaking the rules:  It was BLATANT and WILLFUL misconduct.  I had a decision to make, and I resisted the temptation to do it, and I had people messaging me asking me WHY I hadn't done what I should have done:  I was told I would have support for my Kline, and I did.  I executed my FIRST and ONLY K-line against the user.  and guess what?: I had to JUSTIFY my kline to the admin team, and I did, but:  The admin REVERSED my kline, and  told me that I "had to apologize to the user I klined".  I KNEW I was in the right:  I almost got CANNED as a staffer because of it, and that was NOT fair, as many opers have K-Lined users without a penalty......  Soon after that, the admin told me I was RIGHT, and he apologized to ME for HIS accusing me of misconduct by banning a troublemaker.  I bring this to your attention because:  I had made mistakes on TFN, and I was able to have them help me when I needed it, and most times, they don't delete you for mistakes you make:  Being 'Paranoid' about stories that are inappropriate for the site, or ones that may not be posted with permission is something you have to be CAREFUL of, but I question something, and it bothers me a little: When you have a "One and Done/Nuke someone Policy" for ANYBODY that makes even MINOR mistake on scriptorium:  The reason you use a penalty is because the person is doing something that the admin feels is inappropriate, and I respect that, but I wonder if the right thing to do would be to issue a WARNING first, and THEN if they do it AGAIN you may want to throw the hammer?  I made a mistake once in chat, I didn't ask permission to PM someone:  @spoonchickenthrew the hammer for 15 MINUTES:  I talked to @DailyDi and then we straightened out the problem:  They did NOT "NUKE me" for that mistake, and I would NOT do anything here that would be a violation of the rules:  I would ASK the admins first, that is the way I roll:  If PM'ing someone the FIRST time they are  violating the rules is a "Nuke level offense, as you say, I would have been BANNED FOREVER from this site, and I would also be Nuked at scriptorium!  @spoonchickenbeing an admin, HE COULD have banned me from DD, but he DID NOT do it, even through I messed up   For the Record:  I read the rules over there, and I respect them, and I wouldn't: a) post anything that was NOT mine, or that I did NOT have permission to post. b). post anything that has ANYONE in the story that is NOT an ADULT (18+), or anything that has anything to do with MINORS, or anything that would NOT be appropriate for posting:  I KNOW better than that! c) INTENTIONALLY break any of the rules of the Scriptorium - I LIKE to read stories, and I've written one myself, and LOVE to read stories:  The problem is, that many sites that you could do that at are NO LONGER active, and as far as I know, scriptorium was created so that the INTENT of the site could be maintained, and the Mods/Admins have been empowered to 'do their jobs' and that is cool, but i would hate to be a guy that got nuked because I misunderstood something:  THAT is why I ask FIRST:  That way, no one has to GUESS whether something is allowed or is NOT. d) Do anything that would be inappropriate: such as Name calling, flaming, shaming or putting someone down, or use racial slurs or references that would put a particular class of individuals:  That is WRONG, and unacceptable! However:  While I  RESPECT the rules of your server and I **do understand** WHY some rules are there, I question whether some of these "rules" may cause an individual to question whether or not they want to be a member of your site.  When you want to attract people to be a part of the community you don't set it up so that when reading the rules, you feel as if you are gonna get the equivalent of getting BURNED by a FLAME THROWER or SHOT with a Glock 9 handgun if you screw up - meaning they get nuked, and that is that!  The atmosphere that you set up, and the way you guys and gals do what you do is important:  If someone breaks the rules like posting something that is not theirs, or if they post stories that don't belong, or they do a story that has sexual overtones, and you don't want that, I would ban them AFTER giving a warning, pointing them to the rule that they broke:  Sometimes a "nuke forever" sanction is NOT appropriate, and i would be the first one to "ask you what the heck I did to get banned" if I was banned due to a misunderstanding.  In my example, I almost got banned and deleted because of doing MY JOB, and I would fight TOOTH and NAIL and do ANYTHING I could to clear my NAME and get unbanned or restored to the system:  That is the way I am! Being an admin, I am aware that your staff is paranoid about something happening when someone breaks the rules - I GET that, and I would be the first one to do what I HAD to do to keep the place free of content that is inappropriate, or that would cause the law enforcement authorities to have to visit you and deal with something that puts the scriptorium or its staff or mission in jeopardy!  I have friends I've known since I was SIX years old, and while some of them are no longer with us, they have my respect, and they know my character and my beliefs and I've made mistakes online, and some I have regretted:  I would NEVER hurt any site - I own 5 domains and a server, and I know that you have to make decisions that are easy ones sometimes, and hard ones other times, and that you want to protect the server and the staff of your site as much as possible. My philosophy is that: Any site I am a member of is like being in someones "electronic house" whether it be on TFN, or Geeks to Go, or Besttechie, or DD, or any other site:  You are allowed to be there at the will and discretion of the mods/admins:  I would ASK first, about ANYTHING I am not sure of, because, like you, you said you and your staff are "paranoid" about getting into trouble, so you set up the rules the best you can.  Its your house, your rules - and I respect and understand that, BUT: If you are all "paranoid" about things happening on your site, I understand that:  Quite Frankly sir, I am paranoid that if I join the scriptorium, and make **ANY** mistakes at all, I get NUKED with no recourse:  The way the rules come across to me is "I screw up, I DIE, even for the smallest transgression!"  That does NOT sound welcoming or Fair for someone who makes a mistake - I've been banned before, and it is no fun!  System Security and Board Security are ONE thing, use of your banning tools when someone makes a minor mistake, instead of talking to that individual and finding out WHAT happened from their perspective is one thing I would do:  What if someone did something, like say "Mod X did this to me" and you BAN them for the infraction, according to your rules, THEN you find out that someone LIED to you, and "Mod X" did NOT do anything..... would you then keep that mod banned if you relied on someone that told you a lie, or made "Mod X" look like he did something when he in actuallity did NOT do it - would look bad if someone somebody didn't like was NUKED because someone lied and made someone look bad..... I beg you to adopt a philosophy that says you will NOT nuke anyone for a MINOR infraction:  Guys like me, well, I WANT to follow the rules and do the right things, but what happens if I make a mistake?  My sense is that the rules make it sound like I am "nuked with no recourse". Is that fair or right?  No, but even we admins make mistakes At this time, I will NOT join Scriptorium:  The mere idea that I could "mess up somehow and be "nuked" is troubling, especially if it is a minor infraction:  Major infractions should be those that you make clear Like messing with the boards, LYING to staff, posting inappropriate content, etc.  If someone can assure me that I can USE the site as intended without fear of being banned, I would join willingly:  sometimes people make mistakes, and I am one that has, and i am sure that you have!  We all have, and we should be able to use discretion when someone violates the rules:  NOT    just ban them outright:  Save that for the WORST offenders.  You are the ADMIN:  YOU have the ability to NOT use certain powers, and you have the ability to USE certain powers: I didn't LIKE to ban ANYONE, but, if I felt that it was warranted,  I would ban Like @spoonchickendid to me when I made a mistake and messaged without permission - He used discretion, and did NOT ban me outright, but HE CAN do that!  The point is that he didn't, and for that, i am grateful! Respectfully, Brian     

Dahlia was confused at first… it was the middle of the day! Why was she being taken to their bed? She wasn’t tired! But then, that changed. Their first date had been a roller coaster of emotions for the poor baby and as soon as they walked into the bedroom, it all caught up with her. As evident by the big yawn she let out once she stepped inside!